Obedience Within the Congregation . . . Not Absolute

by compound complex 4 Replies latest members politics

  • compound complex
    compound complex

    http://jehovahs-witness.net/jw/friends/164633/1/Meeting-the-Challenge-of-Loyalty

    From Jeremy C:

    The concept of giving loyalty to men, either individually or collectively, is foreign to the Scriptures. If there was anything that Paul was so forcefully trying to convey in his teachings regarding the relationship of Christians to congregation elders was that obedience within the congregation was relative and not absolute.

    Obedience was given only to the extent that elders did not overstep their bounds and attempt to reinstitute legalism, or a Talmudic system within the congregation. The account at Acts Chapter 15 is a perfect example of how Paul stood up to the elders at Jerusalem who attempted to impose circumcision on converts. If the modern-day Watchtower Governing Body model had been in place back then, their imposing of such a ruling would have been final, and Paul would have been disfellowshipped for apostasy in his opposition to the body. As it turned out, the body of elders actually had to reconsider their position and later accepted correction from Paul, as recorded in Galatians.

    There was also no concept of giving loyalty to a congregational present within the Apostolic writings. Congregations were described as free associations of Christ's followers with no mention of membership rosters, publisher records, reporting requirements, or arbitrary requirements regarding service hours. Paul in his letters to Timothy described the congregation as a family-like arrangement, not a hierarchical arrangement where subordinates were beholden to superiors. Somehow, the modern day Governing Body has glossed over those letters when it comes to their relationship to the flock within the JW congregation.

    First century Christianity was a relationship with Christ Jesus, not a membership within a corporate structure. What the Watchtower organization has built in the twentieth and twenty-first century is a corporate business style model whereby Christians are to relate to the leadership as employees would relate to an employer. I actually learned a great deal by reading Ray Franz's book, In Search Of Christian Freedom. His chapters on centralized authority, legalism, and the congregational arrangement in the first century were very well researched and helped me untangle a lot of the convoluted JW thinking that I held toward Christianity.

    Franz points out that modern-day Jehovah's Witnesses are so deeply ingrained with the organizational concept, with its top-down management structure, that they project this view onto the historical accounts of the first-century Christians. They filter the New Testament through this lens which seriously distorts the facts. If one takes the time to do research into church history (instead of merely reading WT publications about it) one will find that the modern-day JW organizational model is totally absent in the New Testament. It was something that developed after the deaths of the Apostles in the emergence of the Church of Rome.

  • DATA-DOG
    DATA-DOG

    Amen to that! The WTBTS admitted under oath in court, that they are a Hierachy just like the Catholic church. I think that transcript would be a great opening statement for this article.

    Peace,

    DD

  • Phizzy
    Phizzy

    Ah, the great Jeremy C ! well written and well thought out posts were his speciality, I hope he is well and happy, he helped a good number of us to get our brains unknotted !

  • 00DAD
    00DAD

    CoCo, great little essay! Thanks for sharing

    JC makes some really excellent points. Not only would Paul be disfellowshipped if he were around today, but so would Jesus Christ!

    Jesus got himself crucified by pointing out the hypocrisy and corruption of the religious leaders of this day. It's not hard to imagine how things would turn out if he actually were present today and had been raised a JW.

    There is a quote that Ray Franz made in ISOCF to the affect that "with depressing regularity" when men break away from a religious tradition that they believe has lost its way and form a new religion, it isn't long before the new religion becomes as bad as the first, if not worse!

    00DAD

  • compound complex
    compound complex

    Good morning, DATA, Phizzy and OODAD:

    Your thoughts are appreciated. I was looking for something else and came upon this old thread. What a find, this little commentary by Jeremy!

    With gratitude.

    CoCo

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit