Abuse in foster care alleged

by Kent 4 Replies latest jw friends

  • Kent
    Kent

    Abuse in foster care alleged


    Petition for new trial includes allegations adoptive family mistreated convicted killer


    BY JOHN HIGGINS
    Beacon Journal staff writer

    CANTON: The day Michael Dean Scott's adoptive family testified on his behalf, they drew sympathy from attorneys on both sides of his murder trial. Even the mother of one of his victims wept for them.

    Fred and Betty Scott had adopted Michael when he was 10. They told jurors they were devastated when he abruptly left their home and their lives on his 18th birthday.

    Prosecutors argued that Scott squandered the attention the family gave him. Defense lawyers agreed that he enjoyed a loving, stable home with the Scotts, but the family's best efforts could not overcome the abuse he suffered in his early childhood.

    However, a routine petition for a new trial filed yesterday in Stark County Common Pleas Court includes accusations the Scotts beat Michael with machine belts and forced their religion on him and other foster children.

    Scott, now 23, was sentenced to death last April for the 1999 murder of Dallas Green, 19, of Canton and the aggravated murder of Ryan Stoffer, 21, of Nimishillen Township. He also was convicted of kidnapping and aggravated robbery for killing Stoffer during a test drive while the victim was trying to sell his car.

    Attorneys had hoped evidence of Scott's abusive early childhood would persuade jurors to spare him a death sentence.

    The petition, filed by the Ohio Public Defender's Office, criticizes Scott's trial lawyers for not thoroughly investigating the Scott family, who testified during the sentencing portion of the trial.

    Attorneys Angela M. Greene and Wendi Dotson allege that interviews they conducted with two former foster children who lived with the Scott family reveal that the Scotts:

    ``Routinely beat their children, including Michael, with machine belts, which they called `Mr. and Mrs. Brown.' ''

    ``Forced both foster and adoptive children, including Michael, to witness for their religion, Jehovah's Witness, in violation of social services regulations for foster homes.''

    ``When a foster child refused to go to the Jehovah's Witness Hall for a religious service, the Scotts placed two dogs on either side of the foster child to prevent her from getting up while the family was away.''
    The Scotts could not be reached last night for comment, but attorney Jeffrey Jakmides, who represented Scott at trial, said such allegations never surfaced during the investigation.

    ``There was absolutely no indication in the records that his adoptive foster parents were anything but exemplary foster and adoptive parents,'' Jakmides said.

    The petition also contends that the jury was tainted by publicity before the trial and may have felt community pressure to return a death sentence.

    Media coverage included more than 150 newspaper articles and 40 television news stories, according to the petition. Seven of the 12 seated jurors admitted to reading, seeing or hearing about the case.

    ``Local newspapers became what can only be described as giddy at the prospect of Stark County providing another death row inmate,'' according to the petition.

    Greene said Scott's attorneys did not ask that the trial be moved to another jurisdiction.

    ``We'd hope for a new trial less subject to the public outcry over the crimes,'' Greene said.

    The chances of that are unlikely, said Ohio Public Defender David Bodicker.

    Although the petition for a new trial is routine, the Ohio Supreme Court has never upheld such a motion in 220 death penalty cases, Bodicker said.

    Still, the petition raises issues that could be useful in the federal courts, the next step in the appeals process after the Ohio Supreme Court.

    ``We have to go through this in order to preserve any claims for federal court,'' Bodicker said.

    Bodicker said his office's efforts are in addition to a direct appeal of the conviction and sentence to the Ohio Supreme Court, which will be handled by Akron attorneys Renee W. Green and Annette L. Powers.

    ............................................

    PS: Prisca!

    Don't shoot at me. I didn't write the story - just so you have that clear. John Higgins can be reached at 330-478-6000 (Ext. 12) or 1-800-478-5445 or [email protected]

    Yakki Da

    Kent

    "The only difference between a fool and the JW legal department is that a fool might be sympathetic ."

    Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
    http://watchtower.observer.org

  • bluesapphire
    bluesapphire

    Kent, I really appreciate your bringing these articles here for all to see. We might never hear of these events otherwise. As for style, we all have different styles. Who cares? When I first went on Freeminds I was offended by the little guy running in a box and it said that's what a JW's life is. Then as my eyes began to see, I realized how true that little picture was.

    I think if someone is easily offended, they should learn to toughen up. Life is not a bunch of warm fuzzies.

  • Billygoat
    Billygoat

    I've always believed that if you are offended by something, it is because you CHOOSE to be offended. The term "take/taking offense" is an action phrase of the person, not of somebody else doing it TO them. If someone "takes offense" to you Kent, it's because they are deliberately choosing to do it. It is of no fault of ANYBODY else's. Keep up the informative posting.

    BS - I agree - Life is NOT a bunch of warm fuzzies!

    Andi

  • Kent
    Kent
    As for style, we all have different styles. Who cares? When I first went on Freeminds I was offended by the little guy running in a box and it said that's what a JW's life is. Then as my eyes began to see, I realized how true that little picture was.

    That's very true, my friend. What works fine for one person, might not work fine with another. It's in a way like medicine - you can't put all people in the world on the same medication - no matter how good it is. That particular medicine works for one particular thing - and maybe some sideffects. Some good, some bad.

    Often a little kick in the ass is what's needed.

    I think if someone is easily offended, they should learn to toughen up. Life is not a bunch of warm fuzzies.

    Again, I agree. Even though JWs and many Ex-JWs are extremely easy offended, that fact doesn't help them one inch. The world is like it is, facts are like they are, and nobody cares about whiners. Cynical? Not at all, it's facts - either we like it or not.

    I've always believed that if you are offended by something, it is because you CHOOSE to be offended. The term "take/taking offense" is an action phrase of the person, not of somebody else doing it TO them. If someone "takes offense" to you Kent, it's because they are deliberately choosing to do it. It is of no fault of ANYBODY else's. Keep up the informative posting.

    LOL, Billygoat. Naturally, offended is something we chose to be, most of the time anyway. If someone takes offence by what I'm saying - and what I'm saying is true - I simply couldn't care less.

    Some people on this site should grow up, start investigating facts, be more interested in what is actually being said - instead of being so damned preoccupied by "style".

    IF they were - they should at least have a minimum amount of style themselves.....

    Yakki Da

    Kent

    "The only difference between a fool and the JW legal department is that a fool might be sympathetic ."

    Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
    http://watchtower.observer.org

  • Dogpatch
    Dogpatch

    Hi Bluesapphire,
    That was not my site. Even I thought that was a cheesy graphic! LOL
    Randy
    http://www.freeminds.org
    http://www.exjws.net
    http://www.watchtowernews.org
    http://www.randytv.com

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit