Dr McGrath-I would like to quote Marshall Cooke QC on this, but first let me say that
there is the potential for fraud. It is the AEC's job to look at fraud. They did not really do
that in that case. That is a whole mess. Four years later I wrote to the president of
Watchtower because I had been told that Jehovah's Witnesses had their votes usurped. There
were over 200 of those. He lost his seat by 160. The Plymouth Brethren had 50 votes that
were usurped. That was nearly 300. He gave me, in writing, a statement that they had
investigated Macquarie. In Dickson and another electorate in Western Australia they were
concerned about this use of their votes. He put it in writing. I have the statistics. It was four
years later. . . . .Mr LAURIE FERGUSON-Page 9 of this submission cites the question of Macquarie.
It is all right to say, `I am not saying it happened,' or blah, blah, blah but, if I read page 9
with regard to Macquarie, it implies something. It is not actually clear what happened. Could
I ask a few questions about that? Did they find that the 250 Jehovah's Witnesses and
Plymouth Brethren had voted?Dr McGrath-Yes.
.......Mr LAURIE FERGUSON-That is not here. Maybe you could have amplified it and
maybe you are saying that now, but it only says here in your submission that the president
of the Watchtower stated that those who are provisional did not receive please explain
notices. It does not say anything about the president of the Jehovah's Witnesses saying they
had voted.Dr McGrath-That would be a supplementary fact-that those people did vote.
..........
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:oUIbWgpHLx0:www.aph.gov.au/hansard/join
Yakki Da
Kent
"The only difference between a fool and the JW legal department is that a fool might be sympathetic ."
Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
http://watchtower.observer.org