OK TO LIE FOR GOD ????

by ladonna 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • ladonna
    ladonna

    Found this on the net......very interesting seeing as it comes from the JW's own literature.

    1960 "the Scriptures justify the 'war strategy' of hiding true facts from the enemy." (Watchtower May 15, 1960, page 295)
    1960 "As a soldier of Christ he is in theocratic warfare and he must exercise caution when dealing with God's foes. Thus the Scriptures show that for the purpose of protecting the interests of God's cause, it is proper to hide the truth from God's enemies." (Watchtower; 6/1/1960; p. 352)
    "While malicious lying is definitely condemned in the Bible, this does not mean that a person is under obligation to divulge truthful information to people who are not entitled to it. … Evidently the course of Abraham, Isaac, Rahab, and Elisha in misdirecting or in withholding full facts from non-worshipers of Jehovah must be viewed in the same light.-Ge 12:10-19; chap 20 [Abraham lying to Pharoah and Abimelech]; 26:1-10 [Issac lying to Abimelech]; Jos 2:1-6; Jas 2:25 [Rahab lying to king of Jericho]". (Insight on the Scriptures, it-2 245, Note: bracketed text [ ] added. It would be interesting to see how Jw's view Noah's example of getting drunk and Lot's example of incest.)
    1993 "Rahab--Declared Righteous by Works of Faith, What about Rahab's misleading words to pursuers of the spies? God approved of her course. (Compare Romans 14:4) She took a risk in order to protect his servants, giving evidence of her faith. While malicious lying is wrong in Jehovah's eyes, a person is not obligated to divulge truthful information to people who are not entitled to it. Even Jesus Christ did not give full details or direct answers when doing so could have brought unnecessary harm. (Matthew 7:6; 15:1-6; 21:23-27; John 7:3-10) Evidently, Rahab's course of misdirecting the enemy officers must be view in that light." (Watchtower 114:24, Dec. 15, 1993, p. 25)

    Ana

  • Francois
    Francois

    Jesus never lied.

    Francois

    NOTE TO GOVERNING BODY: You've been challenged to a debate, boys. Dont you have ANY balls?

  • nelly136
    nelly136

    theres them who need to know and them that dont, this is handy for
    'persecution' times and child custody cases and of course molestation
    cases, jws can lie to outsiders with a clear consciense if it means
    theyre protecting jw interests,
    nelly

  • Norm
    Norm

    Hi Francois,

    You said:

    NOTE TO GOVERNING BODY: You've been challenged to a debate, boys. Dont you have ANY balls?

    No, they have no BALLS! Here is the proof. The picture below is a snapshot of some GB members on their way to a session in Patterson.

    Norm

  • Kent
    Kent
    No, they have no BALLS! Here is the proof. The picture below is a snapshot of some GB members on their way to a session in Patterson.

    You're talking shit, Norm, he, he. Don't try to fool us here. This image shows why the numbers of the annointed remnant is actually rising. They are drunk as bats, steps outside a clod, and falls down from heaven - killing themselves. So, they need to find some replacements.

    They should never let ol' Booze Rutherford in there. He made a new smuggler route :)

    Yakki Da

    Kent

    "The only difference between a fool and the JW legal department is that a fool might be sympathetic ."

    Daily News On The Watchtower and the Jehovah's Witnesses:
    http://watchtower.observer.org

  • Room 215
    Room 215

    Ladonna,
    Right on ladonna. And as the Jummy Swaggart and voting fiascos demonstrate, ``those not entitled to it (the truth)'' include the dubs as well as the rest of non-JW humanity.
    Once a month at the Kingdom Hall and at every circuit assembly, the local financial accounts statements are read. When will the worlds's greatest bean-counters print an accurate financial statement for all to see? Never, since we're `not entitled.''

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit