Sons of JW's return from war without welcome

by Gopher 6 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Gopher
    Gopher

    Two young men came back from Iraq. Are their parents really happy to see them back? This news story shows how the WT Society directly undermines family ties.

    The parents say they respected their sons' decision but disagreed. If they really respected the decision, why wouldn't they welcome them back?

    http://www.journal-news.com/local/content/gen/ap/OH_Shunned_Marines.html

    Sons of Jehovah's Witnesses return from war without welcome

    CANTON, Ohio — Jason and Johel Woodliff came back from Iraq with their comrades in a Marine Corps battalion that lost 48 members, greeted by a mile-long parade attended by thousands of strangers.

    But not by their family.

    Thomas and Mia Woodliff, who are devout Jehovah's Witnesses, were so upset by their sons' decisions to join the Marine Reserves that they did not meet them at the airport upon their return last month.

    "I begged my mother to come, but I knew she wouldn't," Johel Woodliff, 20, told The (Canton) Repository for a story Saturday.

    The parents say they respect their sons' choices but can't reconcile them with their beliefs.

    "Our two sons were taught to be peace-loving followers of Jesus Christ," the couple said in a statement. "Instead, they have chosen a different path. We respect their right to choose whatever lifestyle they wish. And we hope one day for reconciliation so that we can be a united family again."

    The parents are behaving according to the doctrines of their faith, said a spokesman for the Jehovah's Witnesses headquarters in New York.

    "As Christians, we're neutral with respect to the conflicts that nations have," said J.R. Brown, director of public information for the Watchtower Bible Tract Society. "Our neutrality is just in regards to conflicts of men. This doesn't mean we're adversaries. We try to (convey) that to the person as best we can, but because they're usually partisan, they think we're against them."

    Jehovah's Witnesses who volunteer for military service have essentially opted to leave the church and abandon neutrality, Brown said. Such a move can mean the end of their relationships with other church members, even family, he said.

    Jason Woodliff, 23, said he was kicked out of the house for telling his parents he wanted to join the Marines.

    "I was 18 years old, living by myself in a trailer," he said. "I haven't had a conversation with my dad in five years. For him, it's 100 percent about the religion."

    Johel Woodliff said his parents reacted similarly when he announced plans to turn down a college scholarship and enlist.

    "When they found out I wanted to join, they were very upset about it. I let them know that as I grew older, I had done some research on the religion, and that it didn't abide with my beliefs," he said.

    The brothers say they consider themselves nondenominational but still fervently believe in God. Johel Woodliff carries a camouflage Bible and wears a medallion of St. Michael, the warrior angel, on a chain with his dog tags.

    "War shouldn't be necessary, but war has existed since the beginning of man," he said. "The Bible speaks of war constantly. King David was one of the greatest warriors. It shouldn't be a necessity, but it's a reality."

  • carla
    carla

    This was posted Sunday I believe. But nice of you to bring to our attention again. Very sad indeed.

  • Frogleg
    Frogleg

    The parents were upset that one son turned down a college scholarship? That doesn't sound right.

    I wonder, I really, really, wonder if Jehovah is pleased and proud of those parents? Someone, please tell me, what is the point in having a God of love, if the love is conditional? I would rather my mother strangle me with my own cord than bear me into a life where the only person who could receive unconditional love was the one person who didn't need it. What a greedy bastard God must be.

  • TheListener
    TheListener
    "Our two sons were taught to be peace-loving followers of Jesus Christ," the couple said in a statement. "Instead, they have chosen a different path. We respect their right to choose whatever lifestyle they wish. And we hope one day for reconciliation so that we can be a united family again."

    Oh come on. If they really hoped for a reconciliation they would have been at the airport to welcome their sons home.

    By reconciliation they mean : We really hope one day our sons will repent and rejoin the organization.

    Bullcrap!!!

  • Peppermint
    Peppermint

    What’s wrong with that?

    If my child went off to kill I would be chessed off as well.

    By not meeting their sons at the Airport they are showing that they don’t agree with their decision to go to war, its their right to do so, don’t you think?

    Sure, they are trapped in an authoritarian religion that controls what they believe, but to reject war is not such a minority pastime.

  • carla
    carla

    To use your own sons as a form of protest is just sick.

  • TheListener
    TheListener


    It is acceptable to disagree with your children's decisions and actions. It is even possible to condemn their actions and decisions.

    But, imho, it is the decisions and actions they have taken that are condemned, not the person him or herself.

    By not meeting their children at the airport they showed that not only do they condemn war but they condemn their children for not agreeing with them. The parents don't truly want reconciliation with their children, they want capitulation.

    Since when would a reasonable person conclude that welcoming your child home safe from war, equates with support of the war and the decision to fight in it?

    Edited to add: Yes, it's their right.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit