Remember "illustrations"... the WTBTS uses them to drive-home their points. For example, I can't get the illustration of "good parents who allow their child to undergo a painful operation for its own good" (with picture of parents heartbroken, and crying, reaching child being wheeled into operating room). This was suppose to help us "understand" why God allows the suffering today - for our future wellbeing.
Well, what if the parents had the power to heal the child without surgery. What if they could just say "hocus pocus" and it was all better??? Which choice would a loving parent make: would they use their powers, or allow a painful operation? Adds a different perspective, doesn't it?
Can you think of any other illustrations they used, that when you think about it now, can see how illogical they were?
I'll never forget one seminar I attended. The prof. was speaking to the subject of ethics, and one of the students raised their hand to make a comment (I'm assuming they were JW) - they used the old "frog in hot water (heat the water slowly, and the frog will adjust to the heat, won't jump out and die)". The prof looked at the student and simply said "humans aren't frogs" - next.