The three articles in the Watchtower of 8/15/01 on the life of Abraham take a real stretch of a Biblical story in order to impose Watchtower rules. On page 27, paragraph 8 the Watchtower tries to make that point that many JWs inflict themselves with many trials because they strive for material riches. That may be true but equally many face trials just trying to make a living or are trying to cope with retirement on a very limited income.
Abraham's faith in a future "city," or divine government, helped him not to rely on riches. Would we not be wise to do the same?
To say that people should not rely on riches is utter nonsense when all of us rely on “riches” (a subjective term) and when we retire who else is going to look after us? Not the Watchtower Society!
Abraham may given up a home (with indoor plumbing apparently) and lived in tents but I think that was akin to retiring to a $100,000 RV and cruising around the US. Not a real home but not a bad life either. Abraham was a wealthy nomad. Nomadic people still exist today and can be relatively wealthy. The Mongols under Genghis Khan were incredibly wealthy, and an unstoppable power. Abraham was powerful enough to raise an army from his own nomadic tribe and had enough animals in his vast herds and a big enough drain on the local ecology to cause fighting amongst the herders. I don’t think Abraham lacked for much materially and he didn’t have to flog magazines every week to be God’s “friend”.
Yes, I am sure he awaited the real “city” but he cared for his needs and those of his family without having to beg for welfare from the state.
I guess my comments wouldn’t go over very well at the Watchtower study but I can’t help seeing the Watchtower in a whole new light.
Thirdson
'To avoid criticism, say nothing, do nothing, be nothing'