Service Meeting Part on Transfusion-Aletrnative Healthcare VIDEO

by Inquisitor 6 Replies latest watchtower medical

  • Inquisitor
    Inquisitor

    Our Kingdom Ministry Jan 2006

    Answer Sheet for the Service Meeting Part Entitled

    "A Video That Highlights an Important Medical Trend"

    1. Why are some in the medical community reevaluating the use of blood transfusions?

    Ans: An increasing number of patients strogly favour not having transfuions; the risiks and costs of blood.

    2. Give three examples of complex surgeries that may be performed without blood transfusions.

    Ans: Pediatric open-heart, liver and orthopedic surgeries.

    3. How many physicians and surgeons worldwide have indicated their willingness to treat patients without blood transfusions? Why are they willing to do so?

    Ans: More than 100,000 in 150 countries. Out of respect for their patient's decision.

    4. What have recent hospital studies revealed about blood use?

    Ans: Growing evidence of unnecessary transfusions; less transfusion results in an improved outcome.

    5. What are the medical risks associated with blood transfusions?

    Ans: Bacterial contamination, viral infections, suppression of recipient's immune response, and human error.

    6. What conculsion have many experts reached regarding the benefits of transfusion alternatives?

    Ans: Better patient care, reduced health-care costs; safe, practical, and cost-effective therapies already exist.

    7.What causes anemia? How tolerable is it to humans? What can be done to compensate for it?

    Ans: A low number of red cells in relation to blood volume. Humans can tolerate much lower hemoglobin levels than previously assumed safe. Administer blood volume expanders.

    8. How can red-cell production be stimulated in a patient's body?

    Ans: Iron supplementation. In certain cases, the drug erythropoeitin (EPO) may normalize the blood count. [Note to speaker: Please inform the brothers that in some countries EPO conatins albumin derived from blood. Whether a Christian accepts such treatment is a matter of conscience.]

    9. What techniques are being used to minimize blood loss during surgery?

    Ans: Meticulous surgery, electrocautery devices, drugs that reduce bleeding, and intraoperative cell salvage. [Note to speaker: Please inform the brothers that some products and procedures are a matter of conscience.]

    10. Can transfusion alternatives work for young children and for people involved in life-threatening emergencies?

    Ans: Yes. An example shown involved a four-year-old child born with a serious heart defect who had a series of complex operations without blood transfusions. In one of the busiest trauma centers in the United States that performs hundreds of major operations each year on Jehovah's Witnesses who decline blood, mortality appears somewhat decreased.

    11. What is one of the primary ethical principles of good medical care?

    Ans: Honoring the patient's right to accept or reject a certain treatment.

    12. Why is it important for Christians to make non-blood treatment choices in advance? How can we do this?

    Ans: In an emergency, a victim may not be able to speak to convey his personal conviction. By executing and carrying a HCD card.

  • Inquisitor
    Inquisitor

    No mention of blood fractions and how it IS ACCEPTABLE here. Looks like the WTS is again doing what they did with higher education: "oh we're not against it.. but if you insist on a spirit of independence, you can't be a very spiritual person can you?"

    INQ

  • coffee_black
    coffee_black

    Wow...they never stop, do they.... How about we send this to the AP so they can follow up on their recent story? I'm surprised the jw lawyers let this come out now, with all the stories in the news of late. Not too bright.

    Coffee

  • diamondblue1974
    diamondblue1974
    3. How many physicians and surgeons worldwide have indicated their willingness to treat patients without blood transfusions? Why are they willing to do so?

    Ans: More than 100,000 in 150 countries. Out of respect for their patient's decision.

    100,000 not out of respect but because they have no feckin choice....its illegal in most countries not to abide by the patients wishes....talk about manipulating the numbers and the evidence.

    DB74

  • Woodsman
    Woodsman

    And although they claim a religious reason for refusing blood they continue to focus on medical and heath issues. Why? I think it is only to scare the JWs into following a sketchy religious practice.

    What if it were 100% healthy to recieve tranfused blood? Would they support it? If the answer is no then they should not use medical reasons to make their point.

  • rebel8
    rebel8
    In one of the busiest trauma centers in the United States that performs hundreds of major operations each year on Jehovah's Witnesses who decline blood, mortality appears somewhat decreased.

    Bull crap. I don't believe a word of that. Even if there was such a study done in a competent scientific manner, surely there was no cause and effect conclusion drawn btwn JW blood refusal and decreased mortality.

  • DannyHaszard
    DannyHaszard

    OUR COUNTER-CULT VIDEO http://www.dannyhaszard.com/cultvideos.htm from here Trauma - Life in the E.R . - This is a 15 minute video clip documenting the story of a San Antonio, Texas (U.S.A.) Jehovah's Witness couple who were involved in a serious automobile accident. They requested and received Watchtower approved "bloodless" medical treatment. Both husband and wife died. Real Media player is required .

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit