Hi Deacon: I am making this a separate post, because I believe that your comments deserve some discussion on their own thread.
You opened and then concluded by saying,
"You know what Amazing? You can take the man out the WT but not the WT out of the man." ... Deacon <used to think Amazing was amazing class, until the smell of WT came through>
Why do you choose to open and close with insults? I am merely trying to discuss certain aspects of Gays and their social interactions and behavior. If you don't give a 'flying foobar' than why do you post in response? And why insult me, when I am just trying to have a discussion?
You continued,
"I dont really give a flying foobar about all this. It is so reminiscent of my elder colleagues self justification that it isnt funny. Me thiks you protesteth too much..."
I protested nothing, other than how people misquote and twist what is said. I justified nothing. I said nothing in any manner that would resemble anything left over from JW days. I fail to understand your vague and unspecific complaint.
You continued,
"There are major issues with aspects of sexuality. I dont want to particularly see sex between participants whenther similarly sexed, dogs cats or horses...it just is not of interest."
Then why do you post in reply? While I am not interested in homosexuality of itself, becauset that is not my orientation, I nevertheless am interested in the social interactions that go on, and how I cna better understand these. I even offered to have my views corrected in my original post.
You continued,
"You arent homosexual, you stated that so many times..we got the message. Your love for your fellow male was used to explainyour stand on the matter ... Now ... it always will be difficult to discuss the matter of sexuality with people of differing viewpoints and persuasions to our own ... and there it is ... dont make a fuss, dont labor the point ... and just love the people without watching their personal business or getting involved ..."
If you even read my first post it was written to explain the context of material that from time to time gets misunderstood. Secondly, it was not about sexual practices of Gays, but about their social need to parse and disect every word and phrase someones says and turn it into some politically incorrect intent ... and intent never meant or implied. Second, it was about my concerns over the cries of persecution when Gays have made far better progress in a faster time frame than have African Americans.
Again, you concluded,
"Deacon <used to think Amazing was amazing class, until the smell of WT came through>"
Besides the needless insult to an otherwise interesting discussion, I am sorry to have disappointed you. I am human, and I have my own views and feelings. I do not impose these on others, as I think most all here understand. I am simply trying to discuss an issue in a certain aspect, and again welcome corrections of my views. Now if this disappointes you, there is little I can do for you. - Amazing