These 2 articles are pro-jw.........published about a week ago.
http://www.caymannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000026/002654.htm
http://www.caymannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000027/002779.htm
by rebel8 7 Replies latest social current
These 2 articles are pro-jw.........published about a week ago.
http://www.caymannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000026/002654.htm
http://www.caymannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000027/002779.htm
Well, from my reading, these are far from Pro-JW articles. Quite the contrary.
S4
http://www.caymannetnews.com/cgi-script/csArticles/articles/000026/002654.htm
COMMITMENT of JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES discussion here on the first article
seeker4, did you read the entire articles? They conclude that JWs are great.
Less dangerous than a handgrenade ------------ That guy apparently never even thought of actually being a j-dubby , They won't kill you in conventional war but they will destroy your life by attempting to dictate every thing in it . I thought the latest rumor was that the WTBTS have stocks in the rand cam corporation that makes missles for the navy anyway.
Interesting notion of journalism they have there in the Caymans. Reminds me of the middle-school paper I was involved with.
Please excuse the post from my retarded alter-ego. I don't know where he came from.
One article makes them look like fools (the wrong dates, the changed beliefs, the idiots who argued that Jesus was not a Jew, but a Christian!!), and the other says they are less dangerous than hand grenades - hardly a rousing endorsement! Maybe I'm missing an article - but I read both links. The first one is obviously putting them down, though in a kind sort of way.
S4