The mysterious, indecipherable Voynich MS

by daystar 6 Replies latest social entertainment

  • daystar
    daystar

    I've always been fascinated by the Voynich manuscript. For those of you who've never heard of it:

    In 1912, the antiquarian book dealer Wilfrid M. Voynich bought a number of mediaeval manuscripts from an undisclosed location in Europe. Among these was an illustrated manuscript codex of 234 pages, written in an unknown script.

    Voynich took the MS to the United States and started a campaign to have it deciphered. Now, almost 100 years later, the Voynich manuscript still stands as probably the most elusive puzzle in the world of cryptography. Not a single word of this 'Most Mysterious Manuscript', written probably in the second half of the 15th Century, can be understood.

    Marci Attached to the manuscript was a letter in Latin dated 1666 from Johannes Marcus Marci of Kronland, once rector of the Charles University of Prague, to the learned Jesuit Athanasius Kircher in Rome, offering the manuscript for decryption and mentioning that it had once been bought by Emperor Rudolf II of Bohemia (1552-1612) for 600 gold ducats. The letter further mentioned that it was believed that the author of the MS was Roger Bacon (the Franciscan friar who lived from 1214 to 1294).

    Another early owner of the MS was identified by Voynich when, on the lower margin of the first folio, under special illumination, the erased signature of Jacobus de Tepenec was found. Tepenec was one of Rudolf's private physicians and the director of his botanical gardens and he must have owned the manuscript between 1608, when he received his title "de Tepenec", and 1622, when he died. The MS has changed hands sevetal times, and despite some minor gaps in our knowledge its path from the court of Rudolf to its final resting place, the Beinecke Rare book library of Yale University, can be traced fairly accurately.

    The MS became famous when, in the 1920's, William Romaine Newbold proposed a spectacular decipherment with which he meant to prove that it was indeed written by Roger Bacon, and that Bacon had not only dreamt of, but actually built microscopes and telescopes. When this 'solution' of the MS was disproven by John M. Manly in 1931, the MS gradually became a pariah in world of mediaeval studies. In the 1940's and 1960's the eminent cryptanalyst William F. Friedman made several valiant attempts at deciphering the MS, aided by groups of experts, but also he did not find any solution.

    In 1961 the book was acquired by H. P. Kraus (a New York book antiquarian) for the sum of $24,500. He later valued at $160,000, but unable to find a buyer he donated it to Yale University. Though officially registered as MS 408, it is still best known as the Voynich Manuscript.

    (Emphasis mine)

    http://www.voynich.nu/

  • DannyBloem
    DannyBloem

    did they consider there is nothing to decipher? That it is just random data

  • daystar
    daystar

    Hmm, perhaps Danny. However, I'd think cryptographers would find the lack of pattern telling and should be able to determine rather easily whether it was a cypher or not.

    Despite my interest, I haven't delved all that deeply into the story around this. So I suppose it is possible that there are cryptographers who have determined that it is bogus. In fact, having just googled it again, I find that Wikipedia has some hoax information on it, but it seems rather inconclusive. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voynich_Manuscript#Hoax

  • Leolaia
    Leolaia

    When I was in high school I wanted to invent an unbreakable code to write my diary in. So I took a dictionary and assigned a three or four-letter code next each word. Four digits was enough to go through the whole dictionary, which I did over the summer. Then when school started, I had a code that could only be broken through use of the dictionary. If my diary appeared hundreds of years later without the dictionary, I doubt anyone could break it.

  • Leolaia
    Leolaia

    Didn't mean to kill the thread.

  • AuldSoul
    AuldSoul

    Leolaia, a murderess. Yeah, I can see it.

  • daystar
    daystar
    If my diary appeared hundreds of years later without the dictionary, I doubt anyone could break it.

    Well, sure leo. So the rest doesn't appeal to your sense of mystery either?

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit