Another free energy claim

by Elsewhere 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • Elsewhere
    Elsewhere

    http://www.steorn.net/en/technology.aspx?p=5

    The Energy Project

    In 2003 Steorn undertook a project to develop more efficient micro generators. Early into this project the company developed certain generator configurations that appeared to be over 100% efficient. Further investigation and development has led to the company’s current technology, a technology that produces free energy. The technology is patent pending.

    Our Technology and the Laws of Physics

    Steorn’s technology produces free, clean and constant energy. This provides a significant range of benefits, from the convenience of never having to refuel your car or recharge your mobile phone, to a genuine solution to the need for zero emission energy production. It also provides a secure supply of energy, since the components of the technology are readily available.

    The technology is in a constant state of development. The company has focused for the past three years on increasing power output and the development of test systems that allow detailed analysis to be performed.

    Steorn’s technology appears to violate the ‘Principle of the Conservation of Energy’, considered by many to be the most fundamental principle in our current understanding of the universe. This principle is stated simply as ‘energy can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only change form’.

    Steorn is making three claims for its technology:

    1. The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%.
    2. The operation of the technology (i.e. the creation of energy) is not derived from the degradation of its component parts.
    3. There is no identifiable environmental source of the energy (as might be witnessed by a cooling of ambient air temperature).

    The sum of these claims is that our technology creates free energy.

    This represents a significant challenge to our current understanding of the universe and clearly such claims require independent validation from credible third parties. During 2005 Steorn embarked on a process of independent validation and approached a wide selection of academic institutions. The vast majority of these institutions refused to even look at the technology, however several did. Those who were prepared to complete testing have all confirmed our claims; however none will publicly go on record.

    In early 2006 Steorn decided to seek validation from the scientific community in a more public forum, and as a result have published the challenge in The Economist. The company is seeking a jury of twelve qualified experimental physicists to define the tests required, the test centres to be used, monitor the analysis and then publish the results.

    Steorn has decided to publish its challenge in The Economist because of the breadth of its readership. "We chose it over a purely scientific magazine simply because we want to make the general public aware that this process is about to commence and to generate public support, awareness, interest etc for what we are doing."

  • stillajwexelder
    stillajwexelder

    1. The technology has a coefficient of performance greater than 100%.

    That would break all known laws of the universe

  • Swan
    Swan

    Wow! That could really topple the power base in the world, if it pans out.

    Tammy

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    So, the second law of thermodynamics has finally been overturned?

    In way of review, those laws are:

    You cannot get even.

    You cannot get ahead.

    You cannot even get out of the game.

    James

  • SixofNine
    SixofNine

    Damn! This makes my 100mpg carburator look like chump-change.

  • james_woods
    james_woods

    But you should keep your trust in the Franz oil filter -

    you know; the one where you never change your oil, but just put in another roll of toilet paper from time to time...

    Listen to me now, believe me later,

    James

  • JamesThomas
    JamesThomas
    That would break all known laws of the universe

    Not necessarily.

    If I light a match and set a wad of paper on fire, I get more energy back than I put in, because I tapped into the stored energy within the paper. This same principle could be happing here. But rather than tapping into paper, they are somehow tapping into the vacuum energy which is HUGE and everywhere. Or not.

    j

  • funkyderek
    funkyderek

    I'm sure this will turn out like every other free energy claim since the beginning of time. But it turns out their HQ is around the corner from where I work, so I called them up to see if they're still paying for electricity or if they've gone off the grid yet. I talked to a receptionist who wasn't able to give me that information (!) but I'll see what I can find out.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit