I must say that the teaching of the generation has ultimately floored me. It has affected me much more deeply than any other doctrinal teaching that the WTBS has presented.
I think the blood fractions once I delve into it may affect me equally. Before, it wasn't to big of a concern, but now that I have four kids, I don't need a bunch of old men trivalizing with my kid's lives. You can take this-but-not-that
I figure this is a result of someone in bethel needing fractions; therfore, the new enlightened teaching.
Anyway the point of my thread is that when I think back on all the things I knew/learned/and presented with by the WTBS in the last 40 years or so, all of it made very much sense, at the time it was presented. I believed nearly everything at the time. Right now the teaching of the generation makes complete sense and I agree with it. But then I agreed with the 1914-generation link the way it was presented before too.
I guess the same way with blood, it makes sense, although again, I have not studied in depth. But the drift, as I see it, it now seems to be I.E. If I want to get salt from blood, then yeah, it's not blood but salt; therefore, I CAN take it. I'm not trying to be facetious I am just using exaggeration to make might point.
I first learned the current generation thinking from a newspaper in Los Angeles, CA, USA, I believe. That was when I was an active memeber! Maybe I just wasn't reading the mags, but I missed it. I picked up the WT and A! and examined it more closely and sure enough the paper was basically correct.
After I started really thinking about it I somehow felt violated in that I could be so well manipulated. I guess it is at a depth that I cannot deeply or really explain. It's something that must be felt. It's intangible really. Many, I'm sure, understand what I'm talking about.
My basic question is, if I really know how to ask it is, How can this dichotomy exist? It's like, don't believe what you really know now, because what you know now, may not be what you know then...
How is it, that within the context/realm of knowing something, for right NOW, makes complete and absolute sense, but later will/can be found not to make any sense at all, and the new one, that is NOW/NEW makes complete sense, and yet tomorrow we know it can change?
I'm mean doesn't our outlook on the physical laws of nature and the universe in the scientitfic world change just as much or at times just as radically.? Or is it unfair to compare these two different worlds?
What is the psyhcology or rational for such a dilemma?
I wish the amazing Randy were here. He must understand to some degree how people can be dupped into believeing things that defy the imagination. That little bald bastard is a genius! Sorry Randy, if it makes it any better, I'm a short bald bastard myself. I'm using it loosely as a term of affection.