by Jeffro 8 Replies latest watchtower beliefs
scholar and thirdwitness seem to have disappeared.
scholar hasn't said a word since being unable to provide a single reference from the Society's literature, despite his claims that such references exist, to indicate anything other than speculation that places the return of the Jews in 537BC.
thirdwitness hasn't been able to provide any valid rebuttal - hasn't even tried - to the analysis I have made of his (he claims to be the author) 607 website.
I seem to remember a post a few weeks ago that said thirdwitness had had his number of posts restricted, and I haven't seen him on here since. As for scholar, I have no idea where he went.
I'm free...
Your Free..Whats the point?..You don`t answer questions either...OUTLAW
Listen............do you hear that?...............silence. Enjoy it while it lasts I say! Lilly
My goodness. Some of their posts would make your head spin. Affter all, it is splitting hairs trying to prove 606 or 607 or 538 or what have you. The main thing is THE WTS IS A FALSE PROPHET
You can find thirdwitness here http://ewatchman-exposed.co.uk/research/
Why not take your questions there, since he's not coming here!
That is a truly sad little site! My goodness-why bother if no one is allowed to say anything but "all those evil apostates are wrong wrong wrong!!! and the WT is TRUE as TRUTH can be. NEVER question out loud (or you can consider yourself an apostate!) Don't go ahead of the organization! Their reactions to Greg Stafford's limited return to the cong. was about 99% to the effect of "How lacking in humility" Like the man can't have serious doubts, express them and reserve the right to re-think them on his OWN terms! I could not believe it. I have many divergences in thought with Mr. Stafford, but I respect the fact that he addressed the issues and acted upon them at all (can you imagine the fallout he got when he stated his doubts???-gotta sympathise with the man!) Anyway, these are people who should be shouting to heaven that he is even considering returning to that ugly mean spirited place with butt killer chairs, and they instead complain that he doesn't have his tail between his legs in abject humility. Sad sad sad.
Even more the 607 date which the dubs need so much to defend is not their own date but one worked out by the adventists in the 19th century long before advances in archaeology proved that date to be wrong. But it became central to the dubs and they can't afford to change it even by 20 years.
