The thread about refusing to act disfellowshipped at the hall got me to thinking about another scenerio:
What if the elders contacted an inactive JW to try to set up a Judicial Committee meeting, in essence to disfellowship the inactive one based on rumors, innuendo and circumstantial evidence and the JW refused to go along with the inquisition?
I've heard of people being DFd in absentia but technically that isn't supposed to happen. But let's say the elders inform you that you're being DFd and it will be announced soon. Would this counter-attack work: What if you threatened to sue the individual elders for slander and alienation of affection? Don't threaten to sue the WTS, that wouldn't scare them. The WTS has tons of laywers and tons of money. But if you threatened to sue each individual elder seperate from the church, could it make them think twice about making any announcements?
If they were to contact the legal dept. they'd find that the WTS isn't going to finance any defense fund for them. They'll be on their own because the WTS isn't named in the suit.
The suit could have merit because by the elders deciding to DF you and announcing that you've been DFd (or simply no longer a JW) and from the subsequent shunning that results in such an announcement, you've been alienated from your family, friends and possible workmates just because you simply decided to no longer follow the religion as they think you should. Remember, this is a DFing based on a JC meeting that didn't involve you and there is no evidence of any wrongdoing.
Even if the lawsuit was lost in court, it would cost these individual elders time and money (of course it would cost the suing party as well). But it might make other elders in the area a little more cautious in how they go about DFing inactive people, basically letting them alone instead of stirring up a hornets nest and provoking a lawsuit that could involve them personally.
Is this scenerio too far-fetched to think it wouldn't work?