Something that is common to all of their rules

by ChuckD 2 Replies latest jw friends

  • ChuckD
    ChuckD

    There have been a number of threads started here on the subject of the organization’s seemingly arbitrary rules for daily life. From moustaches to car choices, we all know that there are written or tacitly understood rules concerning almost everything. I have noticed that there is a common element among many of these “rules” and wondered if anyone else noticed it as well.

    This is the fact that the organization’s most important rules are those for which compliance can be easily measured.

    For example, “love your brother” is pretty vague. Who can tell who is a loving person and who is not? Better off ignoring this one to be fair. But “don’t grow a beard” is much more concrete. It is easy to measure, and easy to determine compliance. Same with smoking; ANY smoking is bad, EXCESSIVE drinking MAY be bad. The first is easy to measure; a single cigarette or a cigar to celebrate a special occasion, and BAM – you are on the list of the damned. But the whole drinking thing is just too hard to measure.

    And of course, reporting one’s time in field service goes without saying. You can make charts and graphs with that stuff, and rate people on a scale of their worth as human beings. You could even rank them on a bell curve, with the doomed to the left and those to the right receiving everlasting life. Easy as pie (or pi, depending on the chart).

    Skirts X-inches above/below the knee. Four door cars. High school education. Shirts and ties. Compliance with any of these rules or practices is something that anyone can see – there is no deep thinking involved in determining if someone is toeing the line. Good or bad – that’s the choice.

  • Teirce
    Teirce

    Those grey areas are carefully retained so that everyone, especially the powers that be, have some venue of demonstrating the superiority of their balancing act between Wise and Reasonable. (Which is the dichotomy/continuum of Spiritual-Physical.) Such postures are actually bids at imitating God's ability to be multiple dichotomies, in particular the Just-Merciful and Love-Hate. So, there are ideals we cling to, ie, "It is best to be wise, it is best to be spiritual, it is best to be just, it is best to be loving". But there are realities that we must deal with upon this mortal coil, so that "It is sometimes necessary to be reasonable, to be physical, to be merciful, to hate".

    Any time there is a grey area, it is for the purpose of the practitioners of this craft of balance to impersonate God with his imperceptible, inscrutable, inconceivable gradients of finely (impossibly) incremented standards. Ie, they can be recognized and adulated for having a truly dizzying intellect, as it were a truly dizzying sense of conscience and freedom of speech, while not being required to give reasons. It this way they get to be god for a moment by giving arbitrary rulings and not being held accountable.

    Even if Paul said a bit of wine was ok, the WTS could easily make it as unscriptural as they did for smoking which isnt mentioned, if they wanted to. It serves them, however, to maintain an edifice of genteel civility in at least a handful of things, lest too much black and white in simplicities betrayed their utter disregard for Actual, Real, Native conscience.

    They desire a "Bible-trained conscience" in their rank-n-file, one that can be trusted to respond with stupefied awe to the inscrutable rulings of conscience by their superiors. Rank-n-swiss who question the motivation, standard, meaning or conditions behind the formulation of the local deity's particular ruling on the conscience matter do not have a "Bible-trained conscience".

  • CornerStone
    CornerStone

    Hello ChuckD,

    I think you found the heart of the matter when you said,

    "You can make charts and graphs with that stuff, and rate people on a scale of their worth as human beings."

    This is the borgs way of making the God/human relationship "clear" to them. In the impending senility of their minds they believe they are able to grasp the will of God by measuring human behavior against their many rules. The more rules, the better able they are to discern the "will of God". As more and more drones adhere to those rules the borg masters believe they are doing somthing right. This sets a never ending cycle into play with most drones, (myself included), being the big losers.

    I could just imagine having the oppertunity to stand in front of a borg master and say;

    "Borg master, your many rules have no Biblical bases and are hurting people!"

    ...inwhich he would reply with a twinkle in his eye and a smile on his face;

    "Foolish apostate, our rules are God's rules so don't rock the boat. Plus, could you stand over there when the lightning begines to strike?"

    CornerStone

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit