Has anyone been involved in Convention feedback for the society? Apparently the society does actually seek a response from 'focus group' (if you will) after each Convention to see how various aspects were received. From what I heard many of the comments can be quite frank: i.e. "boring", "superficial", "not very practical" and so on.
When I heard about this arrangement I was a firm believer and my instinctive response was: "Why does the society need this? They are directed by Jehovah - they shouldn't be looking to the brothers for advice!" Now that I am a semi-apostate I think that the problem, from a practical viewpoint, is rather that they apparently do not take such feedback seriously enough.
Slim