Russell's thoughts on the Masons

by Lady Lee 8 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    [R1827 : page 143]

    SECRET AND BENEFICIAL SOCIETIES.

    ----------

    DEAR BROTHER:--I would like to have your opinion on the subject of life insurance. They are organizing lodges all around here--United Workmen, Knights of Pythias, Red Men, Masons, Odd Fellows, etc. They are working it just about like sectarianism in the churches. Would like to see an article in the TOWER on the subject.

    Yours in the love of the truth, W. E. KILLAM.

    OUR REPLY TO THE QUERY.

    ----------

    In our judgment the majority of "secret societies" are merely beneficiary and have no secret schemes antagonistic to the general public welfare, the secret rites and ceremonies being merely "boys' play," occupying the time and attention of persons who have no greater aims than those which pertain to the present life. We note, however, that several Roman Catholic Societies seem to have schemes connected with the use of fire-arms, and are therefore to be classed as malevolent rather than benevolent.

    We note also that the Order of Free Masons, if judged by its past history, has some secret object or scheme, more than fraternity and financial aid in time of sickness or death. And, so far as we can judge, there is a certain amount of profane worship or mummery connected with the rites of this order and some others, which the members do not comprehend, but which, in many cases, serves to satisfy the cravings of the natural mind for worship, and thus hinders it from seeking the worship of God in spirit and in truth--through Christ, the only appointed Mediator and Grand Master.

    In proportion as such societies consume valuable time in foolish, senseless rites and ceremonies, and in substituting the worship of their officers, and the use of words and symbols which have no meaning to them, for the worship of God, in his appointed way--through Christ, and according to knowledge and the spirit of a sound mind--in that proportion these societies are grievous evils, regardless of the [R1827 : page 144] financial gains or losses connected with membership in them.

    But respecting those orders which are merely Mutual Insurance Societies, in which the members pay a certain weekly sum of money to their sick, and at death a larger sum to their families, we must concede that they represent a good principle. It is certainly in harmony with the golden rule to help our neighbor when he is in need. The only objection we see to this is, that it puts the matter on a business or selfish basis and thus destroys its benevolentfeatures; for each one joins, not for the good he can do, but for the help he hopes to obtain for himself or his family.

    If, therefore, the matter be considered merely as a business arrangement, we can see no more wrong in joining such Mutual Benefit Societies than in taking out a policy in a regular Life or Accident Insurance Co., or insuring property in a Fire Insurance Co.--provided always that there be no confession of error or binding obligation required, contrary to the liberty wherewith Christ makes free. Wherever oaths of secrecy are demanded it is safe for God's people to touch not, taste not, handle not,--except as oaths are prescribed by public law, as before courts or in reference to documents for public record. In every other case the children of God will be blessed in obeying strictly the admonition,--Let your Yea be yea, and your Nay, nay; for "whatsoever is more than these cometh of evil." It is in connection with his description of the "last days" of this Gospel age that St. James cautions against all binding oaths, such as many Secret Societies demand.--Matt. 5:37; Jas. 5:12.

    We suggest, however, that, even as business concerns, many will be disappointed greatly by these Mutual Benefit [R1828 : page 144] Societies, in the near future. When the time of trouble shall have fully culminated, these Societies, as well as the great Life Insurance Companies and business in general, will all be paralyzed; and those leaning upon them will be sorely disappointed. The only ones who will be secure then will be those who have laid up treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust doth corrupt and where thieves do not break through and steal. All others, even the rich, will "weep and howl for the miseries" which shall come upon them."

    The present agitation for Societies and Unions, which is taking the world by storm, seems to be foretold in the Scriptures, and includes, we believe, not only Church organizations, but all the various organizations which tie men up together in bundles, to-day as never before. (See Isa. 8:12; Matt. 13:30.) These "bundles" or Societies may seem simple and harmless just now, but when the symbolic fire reaches them, when the great time of trouble shall have kindled the passions of the world in general, then it will be almost impossible to escape from these bundles. Pride will hold them together;--none will wish to show the "white feather" of cowardice;--none will wish to appear disloyal in the hour of trouble;--Societies will act enmasse, and individuals will thus be led into positions which they never would take alone. Money also will be a factor. After having paid in considerable "dues," they will not feel disposed to lose that money;--especially when they see the cloud of trouble getting darker and nearer. Thus bound together they will suffer from the "burning," the distress, of the time of trouble, which God declares will be such as was not since there was a nation.

    Better far will those be who lean not upon Egypt (Ezek. 29:6,7--the world), for help, but who lean upon the Lord. The Lord will be their fortress in the day of trouble.

    Such societies, on selfish business principles, are foreign to the spirit of God's Church. In it, those who have this world's goods should be ready to assist the needy of the Lord's family, hoping for nothing again. And all who are members of the true Church whose names are written in heaven, all who have the spirit of the Head, will be willing and anxious to do good unto all men as they have opportunity, especially to the household of faith, who are not leaning upon earthly Societies, but who, instead of spending "dues" in that way, are using their means to serve the Lord, his truth and his people.

    Since we do not condemn Life Insurance Societies conducted upon business principles, even though we fear that they will be very insecure dependencies when the time of trouble shall have fully commenced, some one may ask, How are we to understand our Lord's words,--


    Despite the many claims that Russell had some connection to the Masons it seems he was pretty clear about it being "profane worship or mummery" and "thus hinders it from seeking the worship of God in spirit and in truth"

  • martinjw7
    martinjw7

    Dear Lady L
    this is very interesting. But can you cite a full name of publication [R1827]?
    Thank you
    M

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    I believe the R stands for the WatchTower or one of its earlier version such as the Herald. I could be wrong so if someone knows please correct me.

    I'm a little clearer on the numbers

    The issue is June 1895. and it would be the second article on the page because there is another on the same page

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    I had the data sitting on my computer the whole time

    Zion's Watch Tower

    June 15, 1895 page 143

  • new boy
    new boy

    Lady Lee

    I heard that Russel come up with the "1914" year after studing the numbers on the great pyramid?

    Maybe that is why the Masons conjection thing?

    If any one here on this site knows the answer it would be you, my friend.

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    Thanks for the compliment newboy but there are many others who would know that far better than I.

    After 22 years out I am just beginning to scratch the surface of what Russell actually believed. I've focused mainly on recovery issues rather than doctrine.

    I do believe though that the 1914 date only came up after a few other failed dates.

    The Mason connections seem to come from a sermon he gave in a Masonic Lodge and he used terms of reference that Masons or those in the audience could look around and see might understand his point. That has been totally blown out of proportion as well as some of the symbols used on WT magazines and a pyramid built in his honor.

    Was he a Mason? We'll never know. Was his father a Mason? Possibly.

    But I just figure is you belong to a secret society why on earth would you place their symbols on everything you publish advertizing that you belong to a secret society? It just doesn't make sense. At least not to me

  • martinjw7
    martinjw7

    Thank you Lady Lee

    I found citation previously mentioned at http://www.ctrussell.us/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_Publications_of_Jehovah's_Witnesses

    In my opinion is very important keep also a formal aspect of articles. Thank you for your research.

    Martin

  • Kaput
    Kaput

    From the sermon "The Brotherhood of Christ" found on pages 702-703 in the book Pastor Russell's Sermons (1917):

    Our Redeemer's words give the key suggesting the characteristics for which we would seek. He says: "By this shall all men know that ye are My disciples, if ye have love for one another." (John 13:35.) He emphasizes this, saying, "A new commandment I give unto you, that ye love one another as I have loved you." (John 13:34.) Ah, we get the thought that the Church is a blessed brotherhood of all those who not only love God supremely, so that they delight to do His will, even at the cost of self-interest, but who also love one another as Christ loved them, which signifies to the extent of willingness to lay down their lives for one another! We look in vain for such an organization amongst men. We perceive various bundles or organizations under various names, all professing love, but none of them even dreaming of such bonds of love. We are not forgetting the Masons, the Odd Fellows, the Presbyterians, the Methodists, the Episcopalians, the Lutherans, the Roman Catholics, etc. But none of these claim to be such a brotherhood as our Lord has described. They do indeed claim to give special attention to each other's interests, and to have certain reverence for God, but not to the extent that our Master intimated---not to the extent of laying down their lives in doing the will of the Father and in their love for the brethren.

  • Lady Lee
    Lady Lee

    Excellent find Kaput

    Martin I totally agree which is why I left the R reference on it. But you are correct that the journal name and date is a lot easier for people to understand and then find

    As for your link, I actually found this article at

    http://www.agsconsulting.com/htdbnon/links.htm

    Scroll down to the number you are looking for and click - you have it

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit