The government of France has different reasons for being interested in defining and listing cults than the FBI in the USA it seems. That doesn't mean that a particular cult is any less bad or notorious. The Watchtower is certainly notorious. The WTBTS is a heavy handed group of un-educated power mongers led by fictions.
And has anyone else ever noticed that there is NO “Watchtower” in scripture as part of any particular teaching but THERE IS prominent use of “Watchtower” in Dungeons and Dragons type games and forms of Witchcraft including spells involving “Watchtower”? See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watchtower_%28magic%29
And MSN search for “Watchtower” alone & with “Magic Spell” or “Occult” or “Witchcraft”. CT Russell was a 33 rd degree freemason ( Illuminati) nutcase who read books by guys that measured the lengths of the halls in pyramids to foretell the future by. He would have done as well casting dried bones about. The Illuminati are a real group that was founded on May 1 1776, so I read, and wrote books and essays on their goals of a “one world government” the “New World Order”. There is no “New World” in the Bible - thus the Watchtower bible’s name “New World Translation” isn’t based on the Bible passage relating the good news of “New Heavens and a New Earth”. “World” isn’t synonymous with “Heaven” or “Earth” in scripture. “New World” is an abomination scripturally speaking.
Note: "Conspiracy Theory" is a term intended to intimidate. Conspiracies exist or Congress wouldn't pass legislation defining and forbidding them! A conspiracy does not have to meet the terms found in any particular legislation to be such of course! Soooo, when you hear or read these words: "Huh, another Free-mason, Illuminati, New-World Order Conspiracy Theorist", remember that person is purposefully or inadvertently helping said conspiracies. And the definition of a theory is not the same as the definition of a hypothesis. A theory is a statement which has reasons and data SUPPORTING a hypothesis. Theorists have valid information. A theorist thus has more proof for an idea than say - many articles of "faith" have.
Regards,
Paul