SICKO

by sammielee24 5 Replies latest jw friends

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    Michael Moore's new documentary is finally going to be seen in movie theaters in early July! If you haven't already heard, it's all about the USA health care and just how bad it really is. Now of course, the US gov't is trying to minimize the damage - just like they did in his 9/11 movie - which is laughable now because so very much of what he showed in that movie has come to be realized by millions of people now ....anyway, in response to the charges against him for taking US citizens to Cuba for medical treatment - here's his letter......

    Open Letter from Michael Moore to U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson

    Secretary Henry Paulson
    Department of the Treasury
    1500 Pennsylvania Ave.
    Washington, DC 20220

    May 11, 2007

    Secretary Paulson,

    I am contacting you in light of the document sent to me dated May 2, 2007, which was received May 7, 2007 indicating that an investigation has been opened up with regards to a trip I took to Cuba with a group of 9/11 heroes in February 2007 related to the movie SiCKO.

    SiCKO, which is premiering in Cannes on May 19th and opening in the U.S. on the July 4th weekend, will expose the health care industry’s greed and control over America’s political processes and how it has produced a health care system that is broken and in some cases killing people. The efforts of the Bush Administration to investigate me will not stop us from making sure the American people see SiCKO.

    I believe that the decision to conduct this investigation represents the latest example of the Bush Administration abusing the federal government for raw, crass, political purposes. Over the last seven years of the Bush Presidency, we have seen the abuse of government to promote a political agenda designed to benefit the conservative base of the Republican Party, special interests and major financial contributors. From holding secret meetings for the energy industry to re-writing science findings to cooking the books on intelligence to the firing of U.S. Attorneys, this Administration has shown time and time again that it will abuse its power and authority.

    There are a number of specific facts that have led me to conclude that politics could very well be driving this Bush Administration investigation of me and my film.

    First, the Bush Administration has been aware of this matter for months (since October 2006) and never took any action until less than two weeks before SiCKO is set to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival and a little more than a month before it is scheduled to open in the United States.

    Second, the health care and insurance industry, which is exposed in the movie and has expressed concerns about the impact of the movie on their industries, is a major corporate underwriter of President George W. Bush and the Republican Party, having contributed over $13 million to the Bush presidential campaign in 2004 and more than $180 million to Republican candidates over the last two campaign cycles. It is well documented that the industry is very concerned about the impact of SiCKO. They have threatened their employees if they talk to me. They have set up special internal crises lines should I show up at their headquarters. Employees have been warned about the consequences of participating in SiCKO. Despite this, some employees, at great risk to themselves, have gone on camera to tell the American people the truth about the health care industry. I can understand why that industry's main recipient of its contributions -- President Bush -- would want to harass, intimidate and potentially prevent this film from having its widest possible audience.

    And, third, this investigation is being opened in the wake of misleading attacks on the purpose of the Cuba trip from a possible leading Republican candidate for president, Fred Thompson, a major conservative newspaper, The New York Post, and various right wing blogs.

    On September 11, 2001 America was attacked by Al Qaeda. America responded with the kind of heroism and courage that makes this country as great as it is. Amongst the first people to Ground Zero were the 9/11 first responders and clean-up workers who heroically risked their lives to try to help survivors. Many of these 9/11 first responders and clean-up workers face serious health issues as the result of their heroic work -- and far too many of these heroes have not received health care treatment. The Bush Administration should be spending its time trying to help these heroes get health care treatment and not looking to abuse the legal process to advance a political agenda against me.

    I demand that the Bush Administration immediately end this investigation and spend its time and resources trying to support some of the real heroes of 9/11.

    Sincerely,

    Michael Moore

  • TopHat
    TopHat

    Hi Sammie, What did Mick More have to say about the health care in Cuba?

    The Doctor's get paid next to nothing and patients have to wait weeks and months for a hospital bed if they don't know anyone at the top.

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    I'm not sure what he has to say. It will no doubt be covered in his documentary - but - I would put two things out there to ponder. First - in the USA if you cannot afford to pay for insurance and don't fit the strict and extremely low guidelines for assistance, you don't get care. Second - you can wait weeks and months in the USA to get in to a doctor who might be approved by your insurance company - living in the USA doesn't guarantee you prompter or more efficient care than any other country. Third - how can we honestly say that we have the greatest freedom, when in fact, going to another country to utilize their health services, which is a decision you should be able to make for yourself - in turn, puts you in the position of being criminal. Despite the fear mongering that goes on, a national healthcare system does not equate to non care. sammieswife.

  • BrentR
    BrentR

    If you think healthcare in the US is expensive now wait until it becomes "free".

  • sammielee24
    sammielee24

    Anyone that's used a national healthcare system would never call it 'free'. That term is only used as a catch all phrase to mean quite simply opposite of having a wad of cash in hand per visit. A person using an equitable health care system fully recognizes that the system is paid for through (most often) your taxes - but it is a percentage of all wages that is used for the service of all the people, so all people pay. There is not one health care system that is the best in the world, but since the health of every industrialized nation with a national health care system, rates higher than the USA, it's hard to understand why the people in this country keep holding on to a dinosaur. The latest block in the government should tell everyone that its never going to change - once a drug company recovers their research and development costs, the revenue it makes on it's drug is pure profit. So if most other countries can negotiate a lower price for the good of their people - but the USA is not allowed to do the same - you are held hostage. I believe it was Clinton that I heard this week say, that in Canada the cost of drugs to combat HIV is approx $3500.00 a year per person but the exact same drug in the USA costs the patient $10,000. Pure profit and no negotiation option. You gotta wonder....sammieswife.

  • wednesday
    wednesday

    Another thing drug companies do is buy out their competition so they can continue to sell a drug at a high price well after the patent is of. this is actually a fairly common practice and drug companies do it, figuring that even if they have to pay competitors to not produce a generic drug, they still come out ahead.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit