Court: ... woman can't sue minister

by Rabbit 8 Replies latest jw friends

  • Rabbit
    Rabbit

    http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/153404.html Friday, Jun 29, 2007 Posted on Fri, Jun. 29, 2007

    Court says woman can't sue minister



    By MAX B. BAKER
    [email protected] The Texas Supreme Court ruled Friday that a woman should not be allowed to sue her minister after he divulged details from her marriage counseling sessions to his congregation, saying it would unnecessarily entangle the courts in religious matters.

    In a unanimous decision, the court tossed out a lawsuit by Peggy Penley against the Rev. C.L. “Buddy” Westbrook, pastor of CrossLand Community Bible Church in Fort Worth. Penley sued Westbrook for defamation after he talked to church elders about her failing marriage, which led to to an open letter that was distributed to the congregation as part of a disciplinary action.

    Penley argued that Westbrook revealed to his congregation information he had received during group sessions where he was acting as a professional counselor for her and her now ex-husband. Church members used that information to “shun” her for her behavior.

    Justice Harriet O’Neill wrote that “parsing those roles” -- confidentiality as counselor, obligation as pastor -- for purposes of determining civil liability where health and safety are not an issue would unconstitutionally entangle the court in church governance and impinge on core religious functions.

    “Churches have a fundamental right to ‘decide for themselves, free from state interference, matters of church government as well as those of faith and doctrine,’ ” O’Neill wrote for the court. “It is a core tenent of First Amendment jurisprudence that, in resolving civil claims, courts must be careful not to intrude upon internal matters of church governance.”

    Attorneys from the Liberty Legal Liberty Institute, a nonprofit organization that defends religious freedoms, praised the court’s action.

    “This is a great victory for pastors across Texas,” said Kelly Shackelford, chief counsel at the institute.

    Darrell Keith, the attorney for Penley, could not be reached for comment.

    Penley and her husband, Benjamin Stone, were members of Westbrook’s church when it opened in 1999. Westbrook, as their pastor, had touted his training as a professional counselor, according to court documents.

    The couple had been to Westbrook previously for counseling. Although they were separated, they returned to Westbrook for help, and he quickly involved them in group counseling sessions with other members. They talked about marriage in the context of their faith.

    In October 2000, Penley told Westbrook that she intended to divorce her husband, and Westbrook recommended an attorney.

    She also resigned her membership in the church because its bylaws set forth procedures that would allow the congregation to discipline her and others for inappropriate behavior.

    Despite her resignation, Westbrook met with church elders and later distributed a letter about Penley’s decision to get a divorce. The letter said she was involved with another man, although it didn’t go into detail about the nature of their relationship.

    It also said that Penley declined to “listen” in a way that would lead to “repentance.” The letter urged church members to shun Penley as part of a “tough love” approach to get her to see the error of her ways.

    Penley and Stone were divorced in March 2001.

    But Penley, who married the other man, said she was stunned by the actions of Westbrook and the congregation. She sued, challenging Westbrook’s actions as a counselor under the Texas Licensed Professional Counselor Act.

    A lower court judge tossed out Penley’s case after Westbrook’s attorneys argued that she was disciplined within the rules of the church. The 2nd Court of Appeals in Fort Worth disagreed and said that Penley had a right to take her case to court.

    The Supreme Court, however, held that a church’s decisions to discipline members for conduct considered outside the church’s moral code is an inherently religious function in which the courts should not interfere.

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Watchtower Elders will rejoice...and so will their wives. I hope JW's will think twice before "confessing" anything.

  • Insomniac
    Insomniac

    That's horrible! Now these pastors can feel that they're entirely above the law, and above all common morality.

  • Junction-Guy
    Junction-Guy

    What about her right to confidentiality?

  • snarf
    snarf

    I agree with Junction-guy. She should have been told if what she told her minister would become public information.Most people consider those meetings with the ministers confidential.

  • JeffT
    JeffT

    Wow. I hope somebody is thinking through the ramifications of this. If a Pastor can divulge confedential information without repercussion we've just demolished the legal stance that hides pedophiles! If a pastor can reveal information to the public, surely he can tell the police. I hope somebody is on this.

  • neverendingjourney
    neverendingjourney

    The Texas Supreme Court is one of the most conservative in the country. Texas judges are elected, including the Supreme Court. They've never met a defendant in a civil case they don't like. This decision is just a further attempt to restrict the ability of plaintiffs to sue and recover money in a civil case. I doubt they gave the matter any serious thought. Their prime motivation is limiting the amount of successful lawsuit that can be brought. The case could have turned out different in another less-conservative jurisdiction. In any case, it looks like the society is off the hook in Texas. This case is not binding anywhere else in the country, however.

  • Junction-Guy
    Junction-Guy

    JeffT, those were my thoughts exactly.

  • Rabbit
    Rabbit

    I don't know if it's possible, but, I hope this will be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The clergy has the legal right 'not' to have to reveal confidential information told to them by a congregant -- in court cases -- so, how can it be OK, when they want to spread gossip ?

    This is wrong. Are doctors going to get that right to gosip next ?

    Rabbit

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    Sounds to me like Pastor Buddy Bigmouth would benefit from a counseling session with a baseball bat wrought by a minister of the Hell's Angels Church.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit