When I was still in, and after having read COC, the BOE received a letter from the branch asking for the CO's usual per publisher payment for his
health care/vehicle/ etc..... Usaully there is no great discussion involved, the Service Department sets a quota and the Elders' rubber stamp it. They then form this
into a "resolution" for the general congregation which they present at the Service Meeting. No one has ever voted against one, in my experience.
This time the letter had a paragraph in it that said, and I paraphrase, 'of course, if any congregations wish to contribute more than their publisher responsibility,
this would be welcome.'
This is where the discussion began. I was very surprised that I wasn't the one who brought it up. Apparently the PO, the Service Overseer, and this other Uber Elder had
planned to introduce the idea to contribute more than our allotted share based on the premise that we had the "money in the bank." This apparently wrankled one of the older
elders. First, he said, it was not "our money." It was the publisher's money. Second, he said, the Branch was asking that all this money come out of funds that went
into the congo's box, not the World Wide Work box. Weren't the CO's part of the WWW? Why not come out of those funds?
It was great to hear the conversation that ensued. An apostate in the making really saw things so clearly for one of the first times and over something that was usually
handled so perfunctorily.
I saw how the BOE's really don't have the pubs. interests at heart. They really thought much more of their own wisdom than had respect for the wishes of the pubs. I said as much.
When challenged on this, I explained very simply that each member of the congregation had a choice to make as where their funds go. If they put it in the WWW box, that's where
they by virtue of their contribution had expressed where this money should be spent. If they wanted the congo's funds to be spent on the CO's, then they could place more money into the
WWW fund. But they wanted the congo's funds spent on the congo--- reparing the bathrooms, the parking lot, maintenance, a new lawn mower, etc..... In essence, we were using our
authority to displace the wishes of those who had contrubuted. This to me was patronizing and dishonest.
Anyway, there were only 3 elders who voted against the resolution. When presented to the congregation, of course, an explanation was not given to them about how
their money was being spent and why it wasn't going to where they had intended it to go. It was all in the name of Jehovah, don't you know.
This was one more nail in the WTS coffin for me.