My response to Pastor Parsley's Youth Minister

by MikeNightHaShev 2 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  MikeNightHaShev

  I keep getting obnoxious mail whether Hate or conversion type mail from this world harvest church youth ministers and students so I wanted to share my response in order that you might remove the veil from your eyes.

  --start response---

  You might be able to recognize the Harlot Church/Mystery Babylon but you have not yet woken (had the veil removed) to realize the image they created
  was one trying to unite all beliefs into one world religious order (as
  preachers say will happen in our times)
  whereby the RCC (Rome under it's mask) could be the authority. The
  concept of the 2 Horn (duality power) system is that it's both Religious and
  Political but under this system can hide and invade all kingdoms and collect
  taxes through all kingdoms without insurection and tax revolts.
  In Daniel chapter 7 in conjunction with Rev.chapter 13 ten horns rising out
  of the sea it requires knowledge of words/slang used in those days.
  Sea was one of the many underground terms used so that Rome would not know
  they were talking about them.
  Words Like Kittim and Sea refered to ROME while their army were called
  ships.
  Horns we know mean powers.
  So Daniel sees the 10 powers coming out of Romes duality system:
  The ten horns - the major barbaric tribes which undertook the division (not
  fall) of the empire.
  1. the Alemanni
  2. the Anglo-Saxons
  3. the Burgundians
  4. the Franks
  5. the Heruli
  6. the Lombards
  7. the Ostrogoths
  8. the Suevi
  9. the Vandals
  10. the Visigoths
  Perhaps the little horn = The Papacy...

  Ezekiels use of the word prince or king of tyre in chapter 28 requires
  knowledge of history and the place.
  Tyre was ruled by Rome and was known for it's ROCKS (tyrus) and SEA while
  also being where the purple dye was invented thus purple fabric mentioined
  in REV with scarlet colors came from in trade. So being called King of Tyre
  is being King of the Rock (Peter), King of the Sea (Rome), King of Purple
  Garments aka the Vatican. Also being called Prince or King refers to the
  popularity of one of the figures used for the Image of Christ
  which became part of the story as Jesus popularity in Tyre was well noted in
  the NT.
  Everything in Ezekiel 28 about the fallen anointed cherub regards to the
  Church and the character it gave breath to.
  You see the image the church used in it's converged religion came from the
  garden as per Ezekiel.
  The Garden's location was Ancient Persia (ancient Iran not to be confused
  with present day Iran) See Genesis 2:10-14 for the description.
  And what figure on a cross who's virgin birth was on Dec 25th, who died and
  then rose from a tomb 3 days later came from Ancient Iran?
  That figure was Mithra predating the Christos figure. Mithraism was big in
  Rome and especially in Tarsus where Paul was from.
  Do you know about Mithra? If not you best use the Internet wisely and do a
  thorough search on the figure, you might be surprised what you find.
  In fact the Mithraic crooked cross with the sickly man on it that the Pope
  carries is similar to the Predated cross they found near Ireland.

  So you know the Church foundation but you have no clue to the
  figure/image/icon that they created is but a convergance of all
  mythology/martyrs/cults/ and religions of that age in order to bring one
  united religion whereby the tithes (like taxes) went to Rome and loyalty and
  devotion was towards Rome
  as this IDOL god's authority.-warning in Isaiah 44:9, 12-17

  The many borrowed stories of historical characters used in reference to the
  gospel accounts were used to signify the fulfillment of these idol gods in
  order to seduce the cultists. The Fisherman Christ from Capernaum=Yehuda
  of Galilee who die on the cross (6 BC) by Rome for his tax revolt
  -Matthew 17:22-24 & Mark12:14-17 was to seduce the Dagon (fish-man god)
  worshipers. (notice the fish head Dagon Priest hat the Pope wears).
  Dagons son was Baal and you see the Baal symbol of the sun cross all over
  the icons of saints, Mary, Jesus and on robes and even the KKK and nato uses
  the sysmbol of Baal (the cross inside the circle).
  Baal is known as the god of 'harvest' so the stories of seeds, 'Apollos'
  light (the word Pastor Parsely wanted you all to skip), watering the seeds,
  planting harvest and talk about chaffs and wheat and the symbols of the
  harvest on robes are all Baal priests teachings.
  So you belong to the Harvest Church, do you really know what seed you are
  spreading or how much manure it takes the Pastor to spread those seeds of
  Baal?
  Now the sorcery/miracle worker who was a carpenter not a fisherman - the
  Christ figure who was son of Mary who died on Passover was called Yeshu ben
  Pandera (100BC)
  his stoning and hanging are recorded in acts as 'slew and Hung'- the holiday
  references are in Mark and John.
  Rome took more to this character figure because he was half Roman and he
  appealed to the Mystery religions and cults of Mithra and Enki and Egyptian
  cults of Osiris and Horus.
  There were many other martyrs all converged for the one figure which was
  made to seem like one historical person thus they needed a new name, new
  birthdate and time period for the Icon to place him in and when they did all
  kinds of trouble came from this new date, one being the stories never added
  up to the time frames.
  Example: needing to move his birth back to 6 BC because KING Herod (in the
  Christ story) died in 4 BC. However not only did they mess up and need to
  move the date but even that date does not coincide with the Census of 7 BC.
  Furthermore the widows Mite in the NT accounts is a Jannaeus Alexander coin
  (100BC) and so is the real character of Salome who was a friend and follower
  of Yeshu.
  More figures: The christ figure 'Theudas' who's disciples were Martyrs and
  were of the region of the river Jordan and Baptised in the River Jordan.
  another case of integrating all cult and martyr figures into one persona to
  try and attract all bases into this new religion, which also included
  Mithraic
  mythology to attract the Mystery religion, along with other mythologies of
  Hades, Esus, Krishna, Zeus, Baal, Dagon, Athtar the Fierce, Osiris, Horus,
  etc etc. Note; Constantine studied and practices many of these religions.
  By doing this they had some attachment or attraction in expectations of all
  faiths and of course one of them was Judaism.
  But Jews would not fall for the poor attempt because they know the
  expectations of Moshiach is not of a divine person or G-d, from the new
  fabricated and self testified pagan version of a redeemer who was also a god
  in order to use that image to make people submit to that authority.

  Now you are prepared to read my book, that's if you want to see how this all
  comes together in unveiling that deception.
  http://www.vidavision.com/faith/hashev/freebook.html
• 

  MikeNightHaShev

  >> However there is one big thing your
  >> overlooking about Christ vs Mithra. Christ was a real person.

  There's where you are having the problem-Mithra and other myths and deities were sold as real as well.
  By using real historical figures integrated into the legend they give the image breath so that it seems to speak
  -Rev 13:15
  In this you become none the wiser that it isn't a true historical account because you never bother to research historical records of that time period
  to notice there is NO RECORDS of such a fantastic story and life. (I'll show this later in the email)***

  If it was a story about one single persona then they would not have needed to create a new name, new birth date, new era for the character, as well as
  other issues that pop up from trying to create an image from many.
  Example: when borrowing from more then one character the image has two
  professions:
  Yeshu's Carpentry and Yehuda of Galilee's Fishing.
  The character ends up having 2 blames for his persecution:
  1)Yeshu's own tribe.
  2)Yehuda's Tax revolt causing him to be persecuted by Rome.
  Therefore there is a contradiction in some blaming the Jews others blame
  Rome because there are two accounts-from 2 seperate figures.
  The character ends up with the mythologies birth date.
  He ends up with a new name Iesus (in syriac-Isho) which might be the reason
  for the hint in Revelation about son of man coming in his own new name, his
  own new name. The character seems to be in to many places at the same time
  and stories don't add up regarding the escaping to Egypt and the time line
  of the characters. Stories end up contradicting and admissions seem to pop
  up like in Corinthians Paul says the apostles are teaching another Christ
  and clergy admit James seemed to feel Paul was teaching another Christ which
  is why they were at odds.

  Fact: take away the prexisting legends and mythology of divine nature and
  all you have are a few Martyrs who failed to Liberate their people, failed
  to bring the Kingdom in their day and failed their prophecy- Jesus and his
  disciples thought they were in the last days :
  I Cor. 10:11 , Heb. 1:2 , I Peter 1:20, I Peter 4:7 , I John 2:18 etc.
  Luke 21:24 & Romans 11:25 and history of that era show that
  Revelation 11:1-3 occurred already in aprox 70 ad.
  The Bible warns of all these about false prophets who do not speak for G-d.

  Ezekiel CH 13, Deut 18:20-22, Isa. 30:10, Jer. 5:30-31, 14:14, 23:16, 26,
  31-32.

  In conclusion no matter which historical figure you call the Christ figure
  they all did not fulfill the prerequisites of Moshiach and were created as a
  figure by Rome to bring all cultures into their one religious order.
  Which is what John of Patmos (not to be confused with the other Johns) was
  warning about.

  Read my book where I show where Rome has done this before.
  In 3XX bc they did this same scam to the Veneiis with their godess Juno.
  They slay the people, tell them Juno no longer protects them then they set
  up the authority and Temple of Juno in Rome and claim they are the new
  authority and worship of Juno. Rome did this with YHWH. By destroying the
  Temple and Israel they declared the Jew was no longer G-d's people claiming
  G-d did not protect them (of course from Rome itself -notice the similarity
  to the racket business?).
  Eventually they had slain all the many Messiah cults of that day that were
  all torah observant and Rome claimed to these cultists that they now had the
  Temple and authority in Rome for worship of G-d through this Christ called
  Jesus (no-one was left to complain that it wasn't their particular Christ).
  So they used this image to attract Dagon , Baal, Mithra, Hades, Osiris,
  Apollo, Esus, and Krishna worshipers.
  I don't believe this figure came to be what it is now until Constantine who
  practiced all religions made the final adjustments to the character.

  ****Anyway here's the historical reference to that time period:

  1] Jakob Burkhardt considers the wily Eusebius to be "the first thoroughly
  dishonest historian of antiquity." He elaborates on his character as
  follows:
  "After many falsifications, suppressions, and fictions which have been
  proved
  in his work, he has no right to be put forward as a decisive authority, and
  to these faults we must add a consciously perverse manner of expression,
  deliberate bombast, and many equivocations, so that the reader stumbles upon
  trapdoors and pitfalls in the most important passages." (Leben Konstantins,
  2d edition, 1860, pp. 307, 335,
  347.)....................

  ..............[2] Vossius, in the 16th century, possessed a manuscript of
  Josephus which contained no mention of Jesus.

  3] One of the historical writers who was alive during the supposed period of
  Jesus was Philo Judaeus.
  John E. Remsburg, in The Christ, writes:

  "Philo was born before the beginning of the Christian era, and lived until
  long after the reputed death of Christ. He wrote an account of the Jews
  covering the entire time that Christ is said to have existed on earth. He
  was living in or near Jerusalem when Christ's miraculous birth and the
  Herodian massacre occurred. He was there when Christ made his triumphal
  entry into Jerusalem. He was there when the crucifixion with its attendant
  earthquake, supernatural darkness, and resurrection of the dead took
  place when Christ himself rose from the dead, and in the presence of many
  witnesses ascended into heaven. These marvelous events which must have
  filled the world with amazement, had they really occurred, were unknown to
  him. It was Philo who developed the doctrine of the Logos, or Word, and
  although this Word incarnate dwelt in that very land and in the presence of
  multitudes revealed himself and demonstrated his divine powers, Philo saw
  it not."

  4] There was a historian named Justus of Tiberius who was a native of
  Galilee,
  the homeland of Jesus. He wrote a history covering the time when Christ
  supposedly lived. This history is now lost, but a ninth-century Christian
  scholar named Photius had read it and wrote: "He [Justus] makes not the
  least
  mention of the appearance of Christ, of what things happened to him, or of
  the wonderful works that he did." (Photius' Bibliotheca, code 33)

  This would be like Matt Drudge Living next door to the ex-president as the
  ex-president drives his car over another neighbors cat and runs the car
  through into the living room jumps out naked does a Polka playing the
  saxaphone and Drudge never writes about it happening.
  In other words if these Historians never wrote about him, then the figure
  did not exist as they are claiming or they didn't make the characters
  popular till later in time through embellishing the stories.
• 

  Bang

  << You might be able to recognize the Harlot Church/Mystery Babylon >>

  For a couple of thousand years the RCC has been the obvious target for 'Revelation' revelations, especially from those fallen into confusion about faith. It's nothing new, and it's not as if they know about the Scriptures - after choosing them.

  You know the 'house', God's temple, us (if it is); where in a huff the elder son wouldn't enter, being beside himself. What then of the 'wise men'. Well,
  "and entering the house, they found Jesus with Mary His mother"

  Bang