HOW JWS TREAT THE MINOR CHILDREN OF DISFELLOWSHIPPED MEMBERS

by steve2 6 Replies latest jw friends

  • steve2
    steve2

    As part of another post, I asked the following question (but got no reply):

    Has any Watchtower publication ever discussed - or alluded to - how Witnesses are to "view" the minor children of persons who have been disfellowshipped?

    On this board, and from direct experience, I have seen a wide range of treatment dished out to the innocent offspring of disfellowshipped persons. While some Witnesses treat these children with seeming compassion and still acknowledge them, a larger group of JWs shun even these minor children.

    I'd like to know whether there is an "official" Watchtower view on this sad little topic. Any help appreciated!

  • blondie
    blondie

    *** jd chap. 11 p. 149 par. 18 Jehovah Wants People to Gain Life—Do You? ***

    18

    Can you think of other ways to imitate Jehovah in connection with a disfellowshipping from the congregation? If someone had to be expelled, can we be of help to loyal ones in his family, perhaps a faithful mate and the children? They may be struggling to keep up their meeting attendance and ministry. Will we give them the special support that they may need? Another way to show tender mercy is to use "good words, comforting words," opening up encouraging conversation with such faithful ones. (Zechariah 1:13) There are many opportunities for that before and after meetings, while together in the ministry, or at other times. They are fellow workers, dear members of our congregation who should not feel shunned or isolated. In some cases, just the children of a disfellowshipped parent are striving to serve Jehovah. We truly want them to gain life. How can we show that?

    *** w95 7/15 pp. 26-27 Disfellowshipping—A Loving Provision? ***When a family member is disfellowshipped, Christian relatives experience pain. Appointed elders should therefore do their best to be spiritually refreshing to them. (1 Thessalonians 5:14) Elders can pray for them and with them. Often it is possible to visit these faithful Christians to discuss upbuilding Scriptural thoughts. Shepherds of the flock should use every opportunity to strengthen these dear ones spiritually before and after Christian meetings. Additional encouragement can be given by accompanying them in the field ministry. (Romans 1:11, 12) Spiritual shepherds need to show these faithful servants of Jehovah the love and attention they deserve.—1 Thessalonians 2:7, 8.

    The sinful course of a person is no reason to ignore any in his family who remain faithful to Jehovah. Israel’s wicked King Saul was rejected by God, but David did not allow this to interfere with his own affection for Saul’s son Jonathan. In fact, the bond between David and Jonathan became very strong. (1 Samuel 15:22, 23; 18:1-3; 20:41) So all in the congregation should be supportive and loving toward Christians whose relatives sin against Jehovah.

    How unloving it would be to ignore or be unkind to such faithful ones! Loyal family members have a special need for encouragement. They may feel alone and may find their situation very difficult. Perhaps you can share a spiritual gem or an upbuilding experience with them by telephone. If the expelled person answers the phone, simply ask to speak to the Christian relative. You might invite the faithful members in such a household to a social gathering or a meal in your home. If you meet them while shopping, you might use that occasion for some upbuilding association. Remember, loyal Christians who have disfellowshipped relatives are still part of Jehovah’s clean organization. They could easily become isolated and discouraged. Therefore, be alert to show them kindness and love. Continue to do good ‘toward all those related to you in the faith.’—Galatians 6:10.

    *** w91 4/15 pp. 24-25 pars. 18-19 Imitate God’s Mercy Today ***

    18

    We ought to be especially supportive of the family members who are faithful Christians. They may already face pain and obstacles because of living at home with an expelled person who may actually discourage their spiritual pursuits. He may prefer not to have Christians visit the home; or if they do come to see the loyal family members, he may not have the courtesy to keep away from the visitors. He may also impede the family’s efforts to go to all Christian meetings and assemblies. (Compare Matthew 23:13.) Christians thus disadvantaged truly deserve our mercy.—2 Corinthians 1:3, 4.

    19

    One way we can show tender mercy is by ‘speaking consolingly’ and having encouraging conversations with such faithful ones in the household. (1 Thessalonians 5:14) There are also fine opportunities to give support before and after meetings, while in field service, or when together at other times. We need not mention disfellowshipping but can discuss many upbuilding things. (Proverbs 25:11; Colossians 1:2-4) While the elders will continue to shepherd the Christians in the family, we might find that we too can visit without having dealings with the expelled person. If the disfellowshipped one happens to answer when we visit or telephone, we can simply ask for the Christian relative that we are seeking. Sometimes the Christian family members may be able to accept an invitation to our home for association. The point is: They—young and old—are our fellow servants, beloved members of God’s congregation, not to be isolated.—Psalm 10:14.
  • momzcrazy
    momzcrazy

    That would be wonderful and loving if that is what they all actually did.

    momz

  • blondie
    blondie

    Correct, momzcrazy. Their actions speak louder than their words. They put it in print to cover their rears. It reminds me of what Jesus said about the Pharisees. He told the common people to do what they said but not what they did.

    Blondie

  • undercover
    undercover

    What's written and what's practiced are two different things in my observations over the years of being a JW.

    I remember one instance where a single mom (came into the "truth" after having kids) was DFd. Her kids wanted to keep coming to the hall and going out in service. Before she was DFd, many of the friends helped her with the kids because of her being single and having to work weird shifts. As soon as she was DFd, the help stopped. A couple of kind hearted people continued to pick the kids up for meetings and service until the elders told them to stop. When the helpful people tried to say that it wasn't the kid's fault and they wanted to help them, the elders said the sister should have thought about the consequences to her children before she committed the DFing offense.

    It was actually kind of an ugly situation, but in the end the elders won, the sister drifted away and no one ever saw her or her kids again. I think about them from time to time...I hope they recovered and went on to living fulfilling lives. Being treated so badly may have been the best thing for them in the long run...kept them from becoming trapped in the cult.

  • steve2
    steve2

    Many thanks Blondie. Very helpful information direct from the publications themselves.

    I notice the publications do not directly discuss situations in which both parents have been disfellowshipped. The Watchtower "policy" focusses instead on situations in which one parent has been disfellowshipped and gives advice to faithful witnesses who are encouraged to still contact/visit the "innocent" parent and children. As illustrated in the diferential responses meted out to minor children whose parents have been disfellowshipped, the "faithful" Witness remains "free" to add their own cruel little interpersonal twists to the policy, all in the name of keeping the congregation clean. Very Pharisaical.

  • drew sagan
    drew sagan

    The quotes blondie provided show how the Watchtower leadership will write material that can give positive suggestions. But how deep do a few paragraphs go in regards to an issue of such weight.

    Do JWs run off to the bound volumes to look up how a kid in that situation should be treated? Some might, but the majority would base their treament of the child on the social implications that run through the group (i.e. DF'ing is bad therefore the child gets some of this negative energy).

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit