by NewYork44M 7 Replies latest watchtower bible
For many many years I found the sessions to be long, boring, and full of un supported statments.
All that has changed since V has started his weekly discussion on YouTube. I have never enjoyed the Wt studies as much as I do now.
I am a subscriber and strongly recommend the site. Great comments about the FDS. So, are they or are the not the channel of communication from god? You decide.
NEW YORK 44 M- Very good u-tube ! Thanks for posting it ! It truly is amazing how the witnesses use mind control and loaded language like things being from " Satan " or " apostates " to trigger negative responses in their rank and file members . Like we are poison or something - actually it's quite the opposite they are the poison
The Watchtower acts very much like the Ori in Stargate SG-1.
Hallowed is The Watchtower!
Thanks NewYork, we are working very hard to make this information bulletproof and prove, from the Watchtower's own words, the fallacies of this religion. The video referenced above was written in consultation with Don Cameron, author or Captives of a Concept.
See the YouTube Watchtower Comments channel here: www.youtube.com/wtcomments
and download the original videos here.
Stay tuned!
V,
You should be congratulated for your expert work. That last study was very powerful. Right on target. I wish I was able to hear this 25 years ago.
Outstanding!
I like those Watchtower studies better than having to sit in a Kingdumb Hell and listen. It was embarrassing to make a comment on paragraphs against fornication, since I feel that rule only creates problems where none needed to exist. I also felt that making an allowed comment on articles that dealt with prayer would be taken by Jehovah as the OK to slam anything good out of my life permanently (He doesn't need it to be OK--He does that anyways, but it always acts as a catalyst).
Now, I can make real comments on the same paragraphs, and not have that problem. Jehovah might still be a jerk, but at least I will not send a message to the congregation that it is OK. Instead, I will expose those rules for what they actually are.
Now, if only we could have a "Comments You Will Not Hear" study on the 11/1/1989 and 4/1/1995 Puketower study articles...
I wonder if V would be interested in recreating WT studies from the past. It would be interesting to have a historic perspective as of a specific point in time.
