THE FLDS

by Sasha 4 Replies latest watchtower beliefs

• 

  Sasha

  (You know, that organization in the news currently, with the 400 dna tests going on to establish paternity)

  Did you know they celebrate 2 holidays. Jesus birth, which THEY claim is 4/6...Anyone out there that knows how they determined that?

  Oh, the other one is Thanksgiving!???
• 

  blondie

  http://www.mormonfortress.com/april6b.html

  Many Latter-day Saints believe that April 6 was the actual date of Christ’s birth. This belief is based on the first verse of an1830 revelation to Joseph Smith indicating the date for officially restoring the Church.

  The rise of the Church of Christ in these last days, being one thousand eight hundred and thirty years since the coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh, it being regularly organized and established agreeable to the laws of our country, by the will and commandments of God, in the fourth month, and on the sixth day of the month which is called April (D&C 20:1).

  A number of Saints have read this passage as a revelation that the Church was restored on the very day Christ was born. This would mean that according to our current calendar, Jesus was born on April 6, 1 B.C. (there is no 0 B.C. or 0 A.D.). It appears that B.H. Roberts may have been among the first to suggest this reading when in 1893 he commented:
  
  

  I believe that this [D&C 20:1] – better than any other authority, fixes the time of the birth, or the ‘coming of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ in the flesh;’ and that, as to the year at least, agrees with the Dionysian computation. It must be remembered that this revelation in Section twenty of the Doctrine and Covenants was given before the Church was organized—at sundry times between the first and the sixth of April—and that the prophet was instructed to organize the Church on the sixth day of April, 1830, hence it was not mere chance that determined the day on which that organization took place.... (Roberts, 1893, 17.)

  A little more than twenty years later James Talmage perpetuated and perhaps popularized the April 6 Christmas belief with the publication of Jesus the Christ in which he wrote:
  
  

  As to the season of the year in which Christ was born, there is among the learned as great a diversity of opinion as that relating to the year itself. It is claimed by many Biblical scholars that December 25th, the day celebrated in Christendom as Christmas, cannot be the correct date. We believe April 6th to be the birthday of Jesus Christ as indicated in a revelation of the present dispensation already cited [D&C 20:1], in which that day is made without qualification the completion of the one thousand eight hundred and thirtieth year since the coming of the Lord in the flesh. This acceptance is admittedly based on faith in modern revelation, and in no wise is set forth as the result of chronological research or analysis. We believe that Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem of Judea, April 6, B.C. 1. (Talmage, 1915, 98.)

  
  
  Since that time, other Latter-day Saints, including several general authorities (such as Lee, 2, and Kimball, 54], have referred to April 6 as the actual date of Christ’s birth.
  
  While it is certainly possible that this is the correct reading of D&C 20:1, it is more likely that Joseph Smith was simply stating in fancy language that the Church was restored in 1830. I see three problems with accepting D&C 20:1 as a revelation for the actual date of Christ’s birth.
  
  1) Although I may have missed a source, I’ve been unable to find a document contemporary with Joseph Smith which claims that Christmas should be celebrated on April 6. Orson Pratt, who knew Smith intimately, once said:
  
  

  If I were to celebrate Christmas, or the birthday of Christ, I should go back a little less than thirty-three years from his crucifixion, and it would bring it to Thursday, the 11th day of April, as the first day of the first year of the true Christian era…. The first day of the year of the true Christian era should be the day of the Savior's birth -- the 11th day of April. (Journal of Discourses, 15: 261.)

  While Pratt believed that Christ was born in the spring (and he notes that several Bible scholars of his day suggested the month of April), he was apparently unaware that April 6 was the supposed day of Jesus’ birth. This seems unusual if the early Latter-day Saints understood D&C 20:1 as revealing the actual date of the first Christmas.
  
  2) Not all recent General Authorities have accepted April 6 as the Christ’s birth day. Bruce R. McConkie, for example, wrote:
  
  

  We do not believe it is possible with the present state of our knowledge-including that which is known both in and out of the Church-to state with finality when the natal day of the Lord Jesus actually occurred. (McConkie, 1:349, n.2.)

  John Franklin Hall quoted McConkie’s comments in the General-Authority-directed publication, The Encyclopedia of Mormonism. Hall noted that for the present time, McConkie’s statement was probably “the most definitive word on the question” of the dating of Christ’s birth. (Hall, 1:62.)
  
  3) In order for D&C 20:1 to refer to the literal date of Jesus’ birth, it would require that He was born in the year 1 B.C. This is problematic. While April may possibly be the month of Jesus’ birth, most scholars date the year to between 4 B.C. to 7 B.C. As LDS scholars, Brown, Griggs, and Hansen note: “The impossibility of dating Jesus’ birth in 1 B.C. arises from the date of Herod’s death. ...Herod died in 4 B.C. Try as one might, one cannot escape this fact.”(Brown, Griggs, and Hansen, 255.) These three LDS scholars (two of whom are professors of ancient scripture and one of whom is a professor of physics and astronomy) have shown that those a 1 B.C. dating for Jesus’ birth cannot be supported by history, astronomy, or ancient calendrical systems. (Brown, Griggs, and Hansen, 375-83.)

  Also, search this site

  http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=e419fb40e21cef00VgnVCM1000001f5e340aRCRD
• 

  dinah

  There was a segment on Nancy Grace this morning about them. Someone reported that all of the men were probably long gone, and would not step forward for DNA testing. If they could establish which kid belong to which couple, the charges would stick.

  And what's up with those ladies' dresses?? I thought the Witnesses dressed badly. I looked like they have one dress pattern and just passed it around. They all look creepy, especially "Unibrow chick". YUCK!!!

  OH! one other thing, the children were not allowed to have toys. There were pictures of their founder (can't remember his name), all over the compound. He's in prison because of these underage, forced marriages.

  There were a couple of people who called into the show who had been ex-communicated as teens, for much the same reasons Witness kids get the ax.
• 

  dogisgod

  Yup. No toys. No imagination. Just chores. And yes. The "men" involved here aren't out there wanting their kids back. They know they will be charged with sex with an underaged child, polygamy, and welfare fraud, interfering with a federal investigation and who knows what else. Wouldn't it be nice that all that money were demanded to be returned to the working taxpayers. Have assets been frozen? Are they overseas? Buried in MJB coffee cans outside of The Great Salt Lake? Once again we see these d''kheads hiding behind their womens ever so long unattriactive skirts while they take the money and run. What's left? if the Matriarchial DNA can proove the link to the actual mothers and ages of children are confirmed to be from illegal peremeters then what? The father/sperm donor is long gone. Mothers' aren't equipped to make a living so they continue to live off the dole of the "unbelievers" (ie legitmate taxpayers). What a mess. All the men should have been gathered up at the same time but me thinks they already had a plan for this very situation of "prosecution" (or is it human trafficking in the name of a God who's main thoughts are of a penis, or is it just the rights of the God Givin rights of the protate son's of God.)
• 

  Sasha

  getting back to the April 6th thing....I was curious. (Thank you Blondie ) because the Witness's always said September or October...Fall.

  I have known for 40 yrs. plus it was not Dec. 25th. This April thing sounds le-git to me!