Good question!!! The topic of paradoxical thinking on the part of witnesses has been mentioned on previous threads. Another question that I have is this: Witnesses take great pride in the fact that they have brought several cases of their to the U.S. Supreme Court. These famous cases have centered on the right to express unpopular or dissenting opinions. And yet, we all know how they treat dissenting opinions/ideas within their ranks. Why can they not extend to their own members the self-same rights that they have petioned the Supreme Court for?
They oh-so-glibly criticize "Caesar," and yet they have no problem accepting assistance from "Caesar" in the form of food stamps/welfare/ and other social programs. Mnd you,I have no qualms with their accepting government assistance per se. I just wonder at their hypocrisy. Something about not biting the hand that feeds you.
Why do they forbid mention of the word "luck/lucky" (on the basis of its "pagan" origins), and yet happily use other "pagan" terms to designate days of the week and the names of months.
