Of Frogs and Demons

by winnower 4 Replies latest watchtower bible

• 

  winnower

  Revelation 16:16 (Message Bible)

  The frog-demons gathered the kings together at the place called in Hebrew Armageddon.

  Sounds like a Bilderberg meeting to me!

  Do take note... there isa controlling entity behind the kings ......

  The Frog-Demons.

  Now here's an interesting note about frogs:

  Since the early stages of frog and mammalian development proceed along remarkably similar paths, many events monitored in a developing frog can be extrapolated to human development. Therefore, we learn about human biology from studying frogs.

  The word "amphibian" comes from Greek—both lives. Amphibians became the first vertebrates to live on land, and like their "cold-blooded" reptile relatives, depend on external energy sources (such as the sun) to maintain their body temperatures.

  Demons are fallen angels. Angels are a different life form. They are "alien".

  Considering the above information, could it be possible that these frog-demons are morphed creatures?

  Part mammal, part reptile? Part human, part alien (angel)?

  Are the actions of evil people and evil entities not referred to as "cold blooded"?

  Is it possible that the nephilim still exist on this earth and direct the current events?

  Since satan is the ruler of this earth and all kingdoms are his....is it possible that this old testament god is satan? Didn't god cut off communication with humans when they allowed satan to usurp authority in the garden of eden? Was there some interplanetary battle for control of earth and mankind? Was our Creator defeated early in the game? Was it explained as a fable handed down orally? Was Jesus sent to let us know that all is not lost and there is a greater plan in the works?

  I think the only communication we have with the true Creator is through his emissary son, Jesus.

  John 5:

  37 And the Father who sent me has himself testified concerning me. You have never heard his voice nor seen his form,

  If this is true, then that means "the Father" was not the one speaking to Moses.

  Have you never heard of the horns on Moses? put it in your search engines!

  John 14:

  7 If you really knew me, you would know [a] my Father as well. From now on, you do know him and have seen him."

  Jesus did not promote hate, violence, nor wars. He was nothing like the old testament god. Could it be he was telling us the old testament god was not "the Father"? This scripture seems to invalidate anyone who has come before implying they are from the "creator" or "the Father".

  Can you be sure the old testament god is not satan the ruler of this world? Can you be sure that any true communication from our Creator has not been changed by nephilim scribes?

  What is about to happen does not come from your Creator!

  Living Translation:

  16 And the demonic spirits gathered all the rulers and their armies to a place with the Hebrew name Armageddon

  New Century Version:

  16 Then the evil spirits gathered the kings together to the place that is called Armageddon in the Hebrew language.
• 

  nvrgnbk

  Crap!

  You've foiled our plans, once again!

  
• 

  james_woods

  nvrgk - how in the world (well, out of the world) is old Applegate and the his castrated star voyagers doing?
• 

  nvrgnbk

  nvrgk - how in the world (well, out of the world) is old Applegate and the his castrated star voyagers doing?

  Donning the finest footwear in the Milky Way.

  
• 

  winnower

  Amphibian Ark Global Campaign: "2008 Year of the Frog"

  2008 Year of the Frog launch
  Lesley Dickie, 2008 Year of the Frog Global Campaign Manager, Amphibian Ark

  (a subliminal message here, yes?)

  Fetus' Feet Show Fish, Reptile Vestiges

  By Jennifer Viegas,

  Discovery News

  May 18, 2006 —

  The feet of human embryos taking shape in the womb reveal links to prehistoric fish and reptiles, a new study finds.

  Human feet may not look reptilian once babies emerge from the womb, but during development the appendages appear similar to prehistoric fish and reptiles. The finding supports the theory that mammalian feet evolved from ancient mammal-like reptiles that, in turn, evolved from fish.

  It also suggests that evolution -- whether that of a species over time or the developmental course of a single organism -- follows distinct patterns.

  In this case, the evolution of mammalian feet from fish fins to four-legged reptiles to four-limbed mammals to human feet appears to roughly mirror what happens to a maturing human embryo.

  "Undoubtedly there are clear parallels between the mammal-like reptilian foot and the human foot," said Albert Isidro, an anthropologist at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain and lead author of the study, which appeared in the journal The Foot.

  Isidro and colleague Teresa Vazquez made the determination after analyzing fossils of a number of mammal-like reptiles that lived from 75 to 360 million years ago. The scientists also studied fossils of osteolepiform fish, which appear to be half fish and half reptilian. These fish lived 400 million years ago and had lungs, nostrils and four fins located where limbs would later be found in four-footed reptiles and mammals.

  In 33-day-old human embryos, the scientists observed "the outline of a lower extremity in the form of a fin, similar to that seen in osteolepiform fishes." As the embryo continued to develop, the researchers focused their attention on two foot bones: the calcaneous, or heel bone, and the talus, which sits between the heel and the lower leg.

  At 54 days of gestation, these two bones sit next to each other as they did within the reptile herbivore Bauria cynops, which lived around 260 million years ago. This ancient reptile had flat, crushing teeth and mammalian features.

  At eight and a half weeks of gestation, the researchers found the two embryonic foot bones resemble those seen in the Diademodon vegetarian dinosaur, which lived around 230 million years ago.

  "We can tell that the embryo is half way between the reptiles and the mammals (at this stage)," Isidro told Discovery News.

  The two foot bones continue to develop until, at nine weeks, they resemble that of placental mammals as they emerged 80 million years ago.

  This development of feet in the human embryo mirrors how the foot evolved over millions of years beginning with fish and ending with early mammals, according to the scientists.

  Supporting the fish/foot link was the discovery last month of a new species, Tiktaalik roseae, which lived 375 million years ago. It had fish fins and scales, but also limb parts found in four-legged animals.

  "Tiktaalik blurs the boundary between fish and land-living animals both in terms of its anatomy and its way of life," said Neil Shubin, professor and chairman of organismal biology at the University of Chicago and co-author of a related paper in the journal Nature.

  H. Richard Lane, director of sedimentary geology and paleobiology at the National Science Foundation, said, "These exciting discoveries are providing fossil ‘Rosetta Stones’ for a deeper understanding of this evolutionary milestone: fish to land-roaming tetrapods (four limbed animals)."

  http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2006/05/16/mammalfeet_arc.html

  A Campylobacter species was isolated from blood from a febrile patient with precursor T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and after antibiotic treatment, a similar bacterium was isolated from blood 37 days later. Although phenotypic testing did not definitively identify the organisms, molecular analysis indicated that they were the same strain of Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus and were of reptile origin .

  Revue / Journal Title

  Journal of clinical microbiology ISSN 0095-1137 CODEN JCMIDW

  Source / Source

  2004, vol. 42, n o 9, pp. 4405-4407 [3 page(s) (article)] (20 ref.)

  Langue / Language

  Anglais

  Editeur / Publisher

  American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC, ETATS-UNIS (1975) (Revue)

  http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16110224