The Brooklyn pen pushers have blood ink wells.

by edmond dantes 4 Replies latest social current

  • edmond dantes
    edmond dantes

    Considering that the Bible is not infallible and certainly not a medical reference book is it wise and safe to interpret the drinking of blood as the same as the tranfusing of blood and because it is a life and death matter wouldn't Jesus accept the principal of "you must not kill" as the overiding principle in the matter?

    Because the leaders of the New World Society have been wrong on so many occasions is it not sensible to accept the best possible medical advice during a critical medical situation?

    Have the rank and file no common sense at all or do they put their faith in mere mens instructions who have had no medical training whatsoever and isn't it about time they started thinking and standing up for themselves?

  • ataloa
    ataloa

    I see the command to abstain from blood the same as the one about stealing.

    It goes to motive.

    If food is plentiful, a worshiper would never think of eating blood or stealing food.

    It is different for people who do these things when they don't need to, just because they want to.

    If there was a famine, those same men who disfellowshiped you for taking a transfusion would be at the nearest peanut patch taking something they didn't work for and does not belong to them. They are not going to starve.

  • Carlos_Helms
    Carlos_Helms

    Ancient Biblical health codes addressed the need for sanitation and a healthy select people who lived without without microscopes, centrifuges, periodic tables of elements, or PhDs. It started with two-million Jews wandering around lost (and without hospitals, research facilities, vaccinations, or cough syrup) in the wilderness. By the time of Christ and into the middle ages, there continued to be a high possibility of contracting plagues that could wipe out entire populations. By eliminating the POSSIBILITY of contracting disease via contaminants, prohibited activities, foods, etc - and delineating other activities and proper means of waste disposal, the population remained healthy and intact in order to accomplish "the will of the Lord."

    In ancient times there were few separations of church and state. Generally speaking, religious law was THE law. Some modern-day religions have taken these ancient texts and elevated them, once again (only this time, unnecessarily), to the level of "law." Because these "laws" serve no useful purpose, they exist completely at the whim of legalistic religious authorities to whom religious adherents have entrusted their eternal souls. It is as if certain activities (or prohibitions thereof) act as a sort of talisman to please an arbitrary and fickle god who enjoys messing with his people to amuse himself.

    It is when these religious rites and ceremonies become sacrificial that they focus laser beams of negative attention on themselves...and rightfully so. Self-sacrifice is one thing; but sacrificing the unwilling or the deluded is as purely evil as Ammonite child-sacrifices to Moloch.

    In the book of the prophet Micah, one asks, 'Shall I give my firstborn for my sin, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?'(Micah 6:7), and receives a response, 'It hath been told thee, O man, what is good, and what the LORD doth require of thee: only to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God.'(Micah 6:8)

    This isn't brain surgery. A prohibition on transfusing blood to save lives is superstition of the highest order...and those who sacrifice their children (or would willingly do so) are idolaters worshiping a false god.

    Carlos

  • Meeting Junkie No More
    Meeting Junkie No More

    Carlos:

    '2 million Jews wandering around lost...without cough syrup... in the wilderness' - that was just too damn funny!

    But you make a brilliant point in your post - the prohibition on transfusions being SUPERSTITION of the highest order. Thanks for pointing that out so eloquently.

  • dinah
    dinah

    Reminds me of Chris Rock talking about God and the ban on pork for Muslims. Before we had refrigerators, a pork chop was deadly. How we gonna get people to stop eating all this pork? We'll them them God said not to eat it.

    Now that we have refrigerators, if you are starving a pork chop is your friend.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit