Many who hear about the "preterist" point of view become confused since thoughts often run to the idea that all bible prophecy has been fulfilled--for many this cannot be reconciled. For the average Witness, we have never even been exposed to a different view on bible interpretation. Indeed, the Watchtower view of Revelation and bible prophecy is that most everything in the bible applies now, to our special time since 1914, with the end of the system of things and the Great Tribulation right around the corner.
However, where does the concept originate that Matthew the 24th chapter has a secondary fulfillment beyond 70CE? Indeed, the Christians of the First Century were expecting the fulfillment of Christ's Parousia in the 1st Century. Were they fooled? Was Jesus speaking in complex riddles on the Mount of Olives?
But what about Revelation? That proves there was much more to happen after the 1st Century and in "the Lord's Day". Right?
But a question that needs to be asked is: What if Revelation was written BEFORE 70CE? What research has led the Watchtower and other organized religions to the 96CE date? Research Irenaeus and his FULL quote about the dating of Revelation to see if it is conclusive.
If Revelation was written before 70CE, that would change everything. And it would take away the Watchtower's claim that the end is always just around the corner, not to mention all the other details of Revelation they apply to themselves.
While C.T. Russell was still a young man, another Russell wrote an examination of the Parousia and how, in his estimation, the scriptures clearly mark Jesus 2nd Coming as happening in the 1st Century. His examination of Revelation is also compelling, with the end of a figurative 1000 year reign and resurrection yet to be fulfilled.
You may not agree with all points, but I am sure you will find James Stewart Russell's book a worthwhile read (which can be purchsed on Amazon and you may find some free PDF's floating around).
What frustrates me is that, growing up as a Witness, these alternative views of the scriptures were not even acknowledged or discussed. As so-called "bible students" you would think that the Society would want us to understand such points of view. But then again, some of us might start using our minds...
Anyway, if you have read The Parousia, I would love to read your thoughts...