Cult Mom starves son to death says shes not guilty due to Ressurection?!

by Witness 007 3 Replies latest watchtower scandals

• 

  Witness 007

  Herald Sun -Thur April 2 2009

  A US Judge has agreed to drop murder charges against a women accused of starving her one year old son to death if the little boy is Ressurected....Ria Ramkissoon now 22 was accused with four other members of a cult called One Mind Ministries of starving her infant son to death...the leader of the sect who goes by the name "Queen Antoinette" had ordered cult members to stop feeding the child after he didn't say "Amen" at breakfast.

  The mother claims her son will be ressurected. Judge Doory said if her son is ressurected the charges against her would be withdrawn. Her Lawyer Mr Silverman said: "If we had gone to trial her only defence would be, my child will be resurrected therefore I am not guilty."

  {Don't Witness parents use the same reasoning regarding Blood transfusions?......Barinwashed cult!}
• 

  dinah

  Saw that this morning. She got 5 years probation for starving her child to death. The cult leaders said the toddler was rebellious or demonized. Two others are also set to be tried.
• 

  cawshun

  Starving a child, just sick, cult or no cult, how can anyone do such a thing to a child. If that's what that cult is teaching, then our law should stop this nonsense. Where is the comon sense of our law's, no one in their right mind would agree with this reasoning. Makes me SICK! Same with the jw's and the blood policy. They should not be allowed to hide behind a religion that promotes this thinking. It's murder pure and simple.
• 

  WTWizard

  Well, that's one less child for them to molest, abuse, and take advantage of. And for a lousy resurrection "hope"? When will these judges realize that the whole concept of supernatural resurrection, either to heaven or on the Earth, is all a scam set up by the religions to control the masses?

  Or, perhaps we should all just give up on science, use the Unholy Bible as our sole source of accepted "proof" and whatever it says as truth (and direct observations to the contrary as deception from Satan), and just go ahead into the Second Dark Ages. And not go back into those primitive times when science actually explained things more sensibly. While we are at it, we should progress away from technology--those backward days when we had access to the Internet, the space program, weather forecasts that were reasonably accurate, and human rights are unfathomable in this day and age of religious domination. At the rate we are going, that could well be in place by the year 2050.