She commented on how clear the blood components/fractions issue was stated in the new book (we studied it this week). I went along and yes, the chart is very clear on what's allowed and what not.
We were having dinner. After a pause I asked her: "If i can eat potato, and I can eat beets, and I can eat carrots... then why can't I eat the whole salad?" She's slow but she got this one immediately, speechless. Still, she asked: "What are you saying? That we can use blood?"
I said "No. but why are fractions allowed, and components not? If I can use gammaglobuline, why can't I use platelets? Who drew that line? I understand that whole blood can be off limits, but I still don't understand why some components are allowed and some are not".
Then we agreed that if life depends on a fraction (or a component forthat matter), not taking it would be not valuing the sanctity of life.
I presented this to her in the most sincere way, and I know I got her thinking. She didn't fight back as usual.
Yeah I know, small stuff, but a giant leap for me.