INDIA DEPLOYES NUKES

by RickA 1 Replies latest jw friends

  • RickA
    RickA

    No comment needed!

    Prithvi missiles moved near border in Punjab
    Vishal Thapar
    (New Delhi, December 24)
    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Competitive military posturing between Indian and Pakistan assumed more belligerent proportions, with both sides mobilising ballistic missile groups.
    Close on the heels of Pakistani media reports about "activation" of missiles directed at India from its Kharian base, reliable sources indicated that the Indian Army has moved its Prithvi Short Range Ballistic Missile (SRBM) batteries to strategic locations closer to the India-Pakistan border along Punjab.

    The 150 km range Prithvi missile is handled by the 333 Missile Group, which is headquartered at Secunderabad. "Movement (of the missile group) is taking place," confirmed a senior official of the Ministry of Defence. While declining to "talk specifics", he reiterated that "India is in a state of high alert".

    The source hastened to clarify that the Prithvi missile batteries had been "moved" but not "deployed".

    India has based the Missile Group far away from the Indo-Pak border at Secunderabad as a confidence building measure. Because of its short range, any movement of this tactical battlefield missile, and that of its Hatf counterparts possessed by Pakistan, close to the border is a destabilising factor.

    The deployment of this missile in Punjab effectively brings the Pakistani heartland - notably Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Lahore and Faisalabad within striking range.

    The Prithvi is generally equipped with conventional warheads but is also capable of mounting a nuclear warhead. Hence, distance of SRBMs from the border is also considered a nuclear risk reduction measure (NRRM).

    The Prithvi is a single stage, liquid fuel, road mobile and inertially-guided missile. The 333 Missile Group is reportedly equipped with 15 launchers and about 75 missiles. It's weakness, however, is that it takes several hours to refuel the liquid propulsion missile before firing. The implications in terms of tactical response time are obvious. It's also the only Indian ballistic missile which is operational.

    By contrast, Pakistan's operational missiles include the 300 km range Hatf II (Chinese M-11), the 600 km range Hatf III (Chinese M-9), the 750 km Shaheen I (Hatf-IV), the 1150-1500 km Ghauri I/ II (Hatf-V) and the 2500 km Shaheen II, giving it superiority in missile-based weapon delivery systems. But for the Ghauris, all are solid-fuelled propelled, requiring very little time to be fired.

    While India does have the demonstrated technology for 1500 km (Agni I) and 2,500 km (Agni II) missiles, the only one it does have ready in its arsenal is the short-range Prithvi.

    Pakistan military warns of nuclear conflict with India

    CHAKOTHI, Pakistan (Reuters) - A senior Pakistani army officer said on Monday continued border clashes with India could spark an uncontrollable flareup involving nuclear weapons.

    The two neighbours have reinforced positions on either side of their disputed border in Kashmir since a December 13 suicide attack on the Indian parliament which killed 14 people. New Delhi blamed two militant groups based in Muslim Pakistan.

    Local sources said on Monday that Pakistan's army had deployed anti-aircraft guns and moved most troops from the eastern garrison town of Sialkot to the border with India.

    Pakistani and Indian troops only watched each other with distrust from bunkers on either side of a broken bridge at Chakothi in the west of disputed Kashmir when a group of journalists visited the Pakistani side of the front line.

    But both sides reported exchanges of fresh mortar and heavy machinegun fire elsewhere in Kashmir and New Delhi expelled a Pakistani diplomat, raising tensions between the nuclear-armed adversaries ever higher.

    Pakistani Brigadier Mohammad Yaqub said the situation was "highly explosive".

    "Because in that situation, that tension, even a small little incident can result in a chain reaction which nobody will be able to control," he told Reuters Television at Muzaffarabad, capital of the Pakistani-held part of Kashmir.

    He said an all-out war between the two nations could "become really horrific for the entire world".

    Asked if nuclear weapons could be used, Yaqub, giving what he called his personal view, said:

    "But if there is a war between the two countries and if any country feels that it comes to its own survival, probably there won't be any hesitation to use nuclear weapons."

    A brief statement from the military's public relations department said the top-brass of Pakistan's armed forces met in the garrison town of Rawalpindi and "discussed matters relating to defence, national security and professional aspects".

    A source in Sialkot, just a few miles from the border in Pakistan's eastern Punjab province, said most of the troops had left the cantonment.

    "The movement of troops to and from the border has increased. It is more than in routine times," he said.

    Artillery exchanges have increased recently in the Sharkargarh-Zafarwal sector of the working boundary, a 220-km (136-mile) stretch of border between the line of control dividing mountainous Kashmir, and the frontier that runs down the plains in an eastward direction up to the Arabian Sea.

    A senior local official in Sialkot said the army movements to and from the border had "not been very obvious," but declined to go into detail.

    New Delhi accuses Pakistan of fomenting a decade-old revolt in Muslim-majority Kashmir. Pakistan denies sponsoring the rebellion, saying it only provides moral and diplomatic support to the Kashmiri struggle for self-determination.

    Kashmir's main separatist alliance, the All Parties Hurriyat (Freedom) Conference, asked the two nations to exercise restraint in the region, which has triggered two of the three wars they have fought since independence from Britain in 1947.


  • RickA
    RickA

    BJP chief fires off a nuclear warning to Pakistan

    NEW DELHI/ISLAMABAD, 25 December — Indian and Pakistani troops exchanged fresh mortar and heavy machinegun fire yesterday as allegations of spying, kidnapping, torture and a dire warning from the chief of the dominant party in the ruling Indian coalition further inflamed passions on both sides of the South Asian divide.

    New Delhi expelled a Pakistani diplomat, raising the ante in the posturing and ongoing war of words as Pakistan President Gen. Pervez Musharraf, currently on a visit to China, showed that diplomatic moves were not yet exhausted by pledging to crack down on two militant groups accused of attacking the Indian parliament.

    With both the nations on "high alert", the head of India’s extremist BJP party added fresh fuel to the already raging fire by issuing a warning to Pakistan yesterday that it would be "wiped out of the world" if it opted for a nuclear strike against India.

    "We will not be the first to use the nuclear weapon," BJP President Jana Krishnamurthy was quoted as saying by the Press Trust of India in an interview with a television channel. "But if it is used against us by Pakistan, its existence itself would be wiped out of the world map," Krishnamurthy said.

    Amid the moves and counter moves, Indian Defense Minister George Fernandes arrived in Kashmir yesterday, reviewing military preparedness on the region’s disputed border, while Pakistani Army deployed anti-aircraft guns and moved most troops from the eastern garrison town of Sialkot to the border with India, local sources said yesterday.

    Fernandes, who has played down the threat of a full-scale war, refused to speculate on the probability of military action.

    The Indian Army yesterday canceled all leave for soldiers stationed along the country’s western border with Pakistan and even asked some of those on holiday to report back to work. "There is no question of issuing any leave to soldiers at a time like this when there is phenomenal troop mobilization on the Pakistani side of our shared border," said a senior army commander who did not want to be named.

    "It is true that we have asked some soldiers on holiday to drop everything and rejoin their units in India’s western sector," he added.

    Indian forces on the border with Pakistan have been on "high alert" since the Dec. 13 attack on the Indian parliament by five gunmen, whom New Delhi claims were Pakistan-based militants backed by Pakistani military intelligence.

    Thousands of tanks and soldiers have massed in the towns of Ganaganagar, Anupnagar and Jaisalmer in India’s western border state of Rajasthan.

    Last week, India announced the recall of its ambassador to Pakistan and terminated cross-border rail and bus links, citing Islamabad’s inadequate response to demands that it crack down on the activities of Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Muhammed.

    During his visit to China, President Musharraf said his government would take steps against the two groups if evidence proving their complicity was uncovered. Pakistan’s State Bank said yesterday that it had frozen the assets of Lashkar and another Pakistan-based group named by the United States as being involved in terrorism.

    "That is not enough, much more needs to be done," Indian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Nirupama Rao said. "Instead of focusing on tackling the terrorist groups on their soil as we have asked, (Pakistan) is diverting attention to other issues."

    Indian police, meanwhile, said they had arrested a parliament official for allegedly passing "sensitive" information to a Pakistan High Commission (embassy) staffer. A police statement said Ajay Kumar, a senior executive assistant in parliament’s administrative staff, was caught giving information on defense, atomic energy and ship design to the staffer, Muhammad Sharif Khan.

    India ordered Khan’s expulsion yesterday.

    The statement said Kumar’s interrogation revealed that Khan had several times asked him about security arrangements around Parliament House and to arrange a security pass for him to watch legislative proceedings.

    Categorically rejecting these charges, Pakistan’s Foreign Office statement said, "These absurd Indian allegations represented yet another desperate attempt to implicate Pakistan," in the Dec. 13 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament.

    Pakistan accused India of kidnapping and torturing Khan and said it had lodged an official protest with Indian authorities. "During interrogation, (Khan) he was stripped naked, severely beaten and tortured, resulting in visible and internal injuries," the Pakistan Foreign Ministry said.

    Indian Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh firmly denied yesterday any custodial maltreatment. "We deny it completely," Singh told reporters.

    Local sources in Muzzaffarabad said Pakistani Army has deployed anti-aircraft guns and moved most troops from the eastern garrison town of Sialkot to the border with India.

    Kashmir’s Revenue and Relief Minister Abdul Qayoom said hundreds of panic-stricken people had begun migrating from border areas following the exchange of fire which killed three border guards over the weekend.

    Indian Border Security Force (BSF) officials said India had also stepped up security on its eastern border with Bangladesh to prevent Pakistan sending militants through the porous frontier.

    With tensions rising between the nuclear-capable powers, Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee said at the weekend that India was ready for any eventuality.

    "Peace is India's ideal goal and we pursue it zealously. But if crisis knocks on our door the country will not shy from its duty," Vajpayee said.

    "The world should know that although we pray for peace we are well-versed in the art of war."


Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit