ANY IDEAS?
I WONDER WHAT TASTE GENES NOAH HAD?
by badboy 9 Replies latest jw friends
-
-
bluecanary
None. I think he wore a guady dress.
-
Tuesday
I'm not sure what that really means, I'm sure he had the same genes as we did. Though I'd say to really find out you should be looking for a guy named Gilgamesh.
-
OUTLAW
Noah had good taste in jeans..He wore Levi`s..
...............LOL!!...OUTLAW
-
bohm
noah had a taste for bad gals. how do you otherwise explain the presence of herpes, gonorreah, syphilis etc. on the ark? ;-)
-
Jewel
And I've always wondered how he managed to transport those parasitic worms in Africa that will burrow into your brain through your eyes and kill you horribly...
-
badboy
bohm,syphilis originated from yaws in mexican gulf area c. ad 1300
-
bohm
badboy: thanks a million! i read the syphilis argument on a website against the ark. i stand corrected! would hate to propegate a bad argument. to all who are interested yaws is a ******* nasty thing, take a look here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaws (warning, nasty picture - but preferable to syphilis, especially when you have to re-populate the world), that appears to be the father of syphilis: http://www.archaeology.org/9701/newsbriefs/syphilis.html (no nasty pictures). So it appears that yaws by some process turned into syphilis... hmm.... a bacteria has only one sex, so there are no latent chromosomes to explain "variation within a kind". that leaves us with two conclusions as to the process:
- evolution? oh no! surely not. Noah didnt bring any of THAT on the ark!
- a miracle! god sure works in mysterious ways...
ahem. back to the topic. actually i dont have a clue about what the topic means.
-
badboy
My topic was inspired by an article in science maazine about TAS1r3,mehinks it called which influences tasting of sweet things
-
bohm
to those who, like me, was a bit in the wild about what this topic was about, here is a link: http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2006/09/cats_candy_and_evolution.php . its yet another piece of supportive evidence for evolution that makes non-trivial predictions. I think the best counter-argument is that the similar gene structure is because the cats in questions are of the same cat-kind. While i dont consider that argument to be very good for various reasons, i would like to get your perspective on such an argument? (aside from it being a blatant case of special pleading)