Sure does remind me of the recent book study about beating one's wife.
At least the women are speaking up and demanding that beatings stop!
by Elsewhere 8 Replies latest jw friends
Sure does remind me of the recent book study about beating one's wife.
At least the women are speaking up and demanding that beatings stop!
Unbelievable.
Those wife-beaters should appear on the U.S. talk show circuit to defend their right to beat women. I don't think they would fare as well as they apparently do in the Middle East.
BTW, there are a few acceptable ways to beat your wife in this country -- at tennis, chess, golf, etc. Of course, the men can be beaten too.
Islam will never change unless the women "stand up!"
He should try that *once* with Ft. Hood Sgt. Kimberly Munley. He may not like her attitude.
If beating a woman is acceptable to Muslim (except in cases of self defense), then Muslim is not acceptable to me. To beat your wife, especially if said beating is administered as "discipline", simply is not acceptable in any form.
Well my wife enjoyed a little hanky spanky A couple of spanks on the bare ars and she would really get turned on Can't say I enjoyed spanking her but I certainly enjoyed the result.... the sexual wild cat that was released.
Remember the saying 'rule of thumb'...? It originally meant you could hit your wife with something as long as it was no thicker than your thumb. Just terrible that some people still think it's ok to beat a woman.
There is a difference between hanky spanky (which is usually done in good nature) and beating. Beatings are usually done in an attempt to coerce the wife into something she does not want, and hence are immoral (besides, beatings are usually more severe than mere spankings). I must add that "hanky spanky" is usually done with consent, and not intended to hurt or coerce another person.
Is hanky spanky the same as hanky panky? I think Madonna had a song called that.