This question is specifically to ex elders or anyone with some insight to my question.
I read in the flock book (which I downloaded of the internet recently ) that elders were to
Take the initiative to help anyone in the congregation who has taken some false step: do your best to readjust him (Gal 6:1)
It then mentions the following:
Yet, do not create ill will toward a weak one in the congregation who is being helped.
keep watch over their souls, since you will render an account for them too (Heb 13:17)
Discern the difference between a weak person and a wicked person.
My question is this; Is there a level of tolerance elders succumb to? For example, a young brother who is obviously showing signs of depression (not diagnosed), but misses meetings every now and then, gets help from the elders, but may perhaps lapse back again (missing meetings etc basically a little bit up and down when it comes to attendance). Yet that brother, though struggling with his own feelings is trying to attend meetings etc. Is there a point in what you may have experienced/witnessed, where elders simply throw in the towel and simply ignore that brother who is obviously struggling to adjust to his new faith. Have you ever heard elders talk amongst themselves or make comments like 'he's a no hoper' (or the like).
Also, do elders talk amonst themselves to discuss if an individual is weak or wicked for whatever the reason. For eg.. if a brother they deem to be both weak (obviously needing encouragement), yet is considered wicked also (lets say they like to bring the KJV bible to meetings and is perhaps doing things slightly diffrenetly-not putting their report slip in etc)... As a body, do the elders talk it over as to how they view such a person-do they mark them-ignore them-watch them like a hawk etc.
Just wondered how the rules (as mentioned from the flock book above) generally affect elder practice and the BOE as a whole?
TE