by Marvin Shilmer 8 Replies latest jw friends
For what it's worth,
Ancient Blood Transplantation:
http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2010/01/ancient-blood-transplantation-and-noah.html
Pre-Flood Food:
http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2010/01/pre-flood-food.html
Medicinal Use of Blood:
http://marvinshilmer.blogspot.com/2010/01/medicinal-use-of-blood.html
Marvin Shilmer
Bookmarking for later. Thanks for posting this.
Shameful plug.
Excellent information. Thanks Marvin.
Marvin,
Great work. You pull off something very difficult to do: taking subjects made "complicated" by the WTS, distilling them down and demolishing them in short order.
Keep it up!
Farkel
Who knew Noah used blood as topical medicine? Marvy did in his blog, but the person questioning him about this assertion has a hard time understanding his Watchtowerlike reasoning . Great blog.
Minimus writes:
“Who knew Noah used blood as topical medicine? Marvy did in his blog,…”
I did not assert Noah used blood as a topical medicinal agent. I said there is a probability the biblical Noah used blood in this way if he was aware of it as a remedy, that is unless he thought such use of blood was contrary to what he thought was required of him by God. This is because the biblical Noah is presented to us as a human being, which means he had the same need for pain relief and healing as anyone else, and use of blood as a topical remedy to treat pain and other disorders is as ancient a medicinal practice as is known to man.
As I said then, and I repeat now, the conclusion I offered is inductive, though saying that to you is probably a waste of good air.
Have you ever written an original piece of research in your entire life?
Marvin Shilmer
A lot of (34,000+) minimus=a maximus, that is inductive reasoning, too.
Marvy, you call that an "educated guess" per some dictionaries. Ok, sure. That's what I call "original research".
