I grew up in what the society calls a “divided household” being a “spiritual orphan” the son of a “spiritual widow”. Looking back now, these terms certainly isolated us, or marked us as being different from the ideal families in the congo.
There were quite a few of us “divided households” in our congo when we were growing up and as most of the “spiritual united families” wouldn’t associate with us on a social scale, we mostly hung out with each other. A few of our dad’s became good friends as no doubt they had a few things in common, being the cause of divided households.
I remember one elders son saying they couldn’t hang around us as his Dad told him we were bad association, not that we were doing anything wrong, we pioneered on school holidays gave talks, answered up, did all the right things except we had a Dad who wasn’t in the truth.
These terms that the society use, also create an “us versus them” attitude within the family arrangement. Far from uniting families, when those terms are used at the meetings it really is saying “those in the truth = good, those not in= evil” that your Dad is a source of spiritual endangerment.
Just as governments have wartime propaganda expressions, I felt the society used these expressions to their advantage. Far from the original scriptural application of “widows and orphans” it is used now as spiritual warfare propaganda in getting those in to be more loyal to the society instead of putting the family first. On a side note, the elders where we were definitely did not watch over these “spiritual widows or orphans” rather neglecting them big time.
Well I hope my rant makes sense, perhaps my experience is not as others experienced, the above could have just been particular to the city we grew up here in Australia. But I would like to know how others felt and were treated growing up in “divided households”.
Cheers, Mattieu...