Page three...there is a Joanne using 'classic' Jw terminology. I guess whoever Richard B is, he's hammered her into touch! lol
A similar dispute going on here between the same two:
by James_Slash 3 Replies latest jw friends
Page three...there is a Joanne using 'classic' Jw terminology. I guess whoever Richard B is, he's hammered her into touch! lol
A similar dispute going on here between the same two:
What? No live link? Lemme try... http://www.netmums.com/coffeehouse/lifestyle-8/faith-religion-97/353422-cold-calling-johovahs-witnesses-3.html
There! That's better! Thanks for posting that = interesting discussion...
And - hopefully - here's the other thread live link, too... http://www.netmums.com/coffeehouse/lifestyle-8/faith-religion-97/376400-honest-advice-jw-ex-jw-needed-please-5.html
Like Richard says... "Its ok Ana. Joanne stalks me in any thread whenever I dare to criticise the Jehovahs Witnesses...."
One would think that the idiot average JW who does this would realize that they are, in effect, 'associating' with apostates!!!!
I guess religous crusades are still alive and well in the JW folds...
Zid
I was a JW apologist on a similar site 3 years ago. Things change...