Data Lists for UK Elders

by JEMIMAH 6 Replies latest jw friends

  • JEMIMAH
    JEMIMAH

    The following is the latest instructions for UK elders, does it apply to any other countries yet????
    ------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Paste in Page 143.KS91

    Specialised Sheperding - Isaiah 32:1,2

    In the congregations confidential file the secretary will maintain the "Specialised Sheperding List". It should have 5 Columns. The column headings are.
    Name of individual, Date of action, Members of committee or Elders handling matter, Date reinstated/ Deceased, Action Taken

    The Action taken column may contain only one of the following expressions per case.
    Disfellowshipped, Disassociated, Reproved, Appeal Upheld, Reinstatement Hearing, Investigated, Unbaptised Publisher reproved, Unbaptised Publisher removed.

    The term "Appeal Upheld" refers only to cases where the appeal has been upheld because it was found that there was no proper basis for disfellowshipping action. If the appeal is upheld because the individual was found repentant, though guilty of a disfellowshipping offence, the term "Reproved" would appear in the Action Taken Column
    See new letter Sept 1 2000"

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Cheers

    Jem

  • messenger
    messenger

    This was posted with your last post on 11-25-01, we are still waiting for a response.

    To Whom It May Concern,
    Yes troll, I will be the first to state it and then if any of you will do a little research you may learn something.

    1. Who was it that said we were getting a new KS book, claims to be reading it and yet has to produce one shred of information about what it contains?

    2. Who is fishing for posters who may know what supposed KS 01 changes are?

    3. Who gives stories about bethel moving then not moving with explanations that fish for insiders?

    4. Who started a witchhunt with all dead ends on the WCC with no collaborating evidence? Was this to draw attention away from something else?

    5. Who was it that said they had a teaching part about child molestation they were going to post?

    6. Who gives details of meetings with no recourse from WT about finding him out?

    7. Who consistently claims to have some tidbit then never has an answer back when questioned?

    8. Who has yet to make one comment about the UN scandal as far as British bethel internal matters, or anything else for that matter?

    One point could be blown off as a mistake, two could be a coincidence, three starts getting a little curious, after that it puts forth the appearance something is not right. If Jemimah is truly a bethel insider who wants to help those who are on the outside, then stand and deliver something meaningful. ANYTHING!

    All I have seen are dead ends, promised goods and lack of follow through. Jemimah if you are the real deal and your are not trolling I ask you to deliver any one of three things:

    1. Manuscript of your KS part on child molestation.

    2. Summation of text changes from KS 91 to KS 01.

    3. Hard copy of anything related to British bethel and their response to the UN issue.

    If you wish to clear yourself of my charges then stand and deliver. I will be the first to apologize for misinterpreting your actions. On the other hand don't dance around here with inside information that has no substance that could put someone in harms way by WT plumbers. You claim to have beaten an investigation yet you must have a death wish to post a written response from WT correspondence. WT can trace any letter they write to anyone. That makes you either exceptionally stupid or a troll using information to scare those who read it. The copyright information is just too transparent. What other reason would a person have to post a letter threatening the witness owner of a website for putting up WT articles? Do any of you recall the “Question from Readers” about four months back regarding copyright of WT literature? Another threat to scare people away from putting up WT information that exposes them for what they are. I am sure they would love to see the Awake and WT UN articles go away from the internet, thus making it more difficult to sort out how WT supported the UN.

    So what possible reason could Jem have for posting this letter? I could think of much less dangerous hard copy that could be produced that would be much harder to trace to one individual. Such as the three things requested above. If Jem does not answer or have anything to offer, I would suggest anyone who has contact with him to use caution as what you communicate may be used against you and this forum.

    OK Jemimah, you have my challenge to your credibility prove me wrong.

  • Pureheart
    Pureheart

    Is that all Jemimah?

  • Latte
    Latte

    Just another observation....

    JEMIMAH said-

    Cheers
    Yes friendly, but the kind of expression an English GENTLEMAN would use, not a ladylike British word atall.

    Latte

  • Englishman
    Englishman

    Latte,

    You are absolutely right. A fella!

    Maybe he is genuine, one often gets a whiff of something going on, but then it fizzles out. Maybe Jemimah is a pal of a bethel boy and is having to careful.

    Lets wait and see.

    Englishman.

    Bring on the dancing girls!

  • Latte
    Latte

    Fe FI Fo Fum..I smell the blood of an English Troll.....LOL

    Hope that you stick around some more JEMIMAH....your more than welcome

  • alliwannadoislive
    alliwannadoislive

    hmm 'tis interesting - you guys are sharp ... ty messenger :)

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit