by hamsterbait 9 Replies latest social entertainment
"I bought eggs."
"I bought butter."
"I dont believe the Witchtower crap."
" I don't enjoy kippers."
Are these Statements?
Are they Questions? (IN which case can somebody clarify what they are trying to prove)
Or are they mere objections (to be ignored)
Parody away at answering these folks!!!!
HB
If you liked kippers you could have a kipper omlette while missing the Sunday meeting.
W
sounds like John Lennon
God is a concept,
By which we can measure,
Our pain,
I don't believe in magic,
I don't believe in I-ching,
I don't believe in bible,
I don't believe in tarot,
I don't believe in Hitler,
I don't believe in Jesus,
I don't believe in Kennedy,
I don't believe in Buddha,
I don't believe in mantra,
I don't believe in Gita,
I don't believe in yoga,
I don't believe in kings,
I don't believe in Elvis,
I don't believe in Zimmerman,
I don't believe in Beatles,
I just believe in me,
Yoko and me,
And that's reality.
The dream is over,
Finally free:
And WHY exactly do you think having an omelette could justify missing the meeting?
I am not absolutely sure (not thinking as much of myself as you obviously do) that eating omelete actually drowns out the dislike for kippers.
Back on topic:
As you know, having to eat kippers for breakfast in the middle ages made many rebellious ones non-receptive to omelette. What exactly was your question trying to ascertain here? There are many alternative breakfast recipes in Mrs Beaton, without resorting to mockery. Unless you merely raise an objection.
Darth - perhaps if the dream is over you can give a more succinct answer instead of trawling through worldly writings attempting to appear profound. Your motives are purely selfish.
HB
LOL. Are you "channeling" DJeggnog?
Essan: Your response is so obviously intended to belittle the source of information that I shall not deign to take offence. Nor shall I refute your obviously HATE motivated claims.
"Parody" along with with sarcasm and honesty rarely make either questions or objectional issues clear.
This is why we have had increasing light over 140 years: to let us know that very little up until now has been correctly understood and applied. ( except what jehovah's slave has proved in the past) The evident fact it was proved then adjusted is what "new light " means.
This benefits us, as knowing that nothing we ever believed before was true makes us humble (do you think humility important - if so "WHY" you did not make this clear)
Our confidence in "present truth" , confirms that things are more like they are now than they have ever been before. This can only increase our firm determination to follow the leadership of the Christ: Wherever they take us, there we are. What more proof do we need that Jehovah trusts the Slave, and Jesus trusts the slave.
But this goes without saying, so: back on topic.
What was your question. You didnt make it clear.
HB
LOLOL Brilliant HB.
It's like DjEggnogg was really here!
However, your posts need to be about 10 times longer.
But can you tell me - and please just give me a straight answer - what time is it?
Essan -
I find your deliberate hostile focus on this thread offensive. However as a faithful loving JW I shall attempt to answer you with humanitarian indulgence, confident that you will not be slain by Jehovahs executional armies, should he find your objections to my irrefutable position to be valid.
You question as to the time was not clear.
Evidently as we are living in what the FDS calls the time of the end, this is the time you should be concerned about. many unbelieving ones merely concern themselves about the time they have worked, or when the liquor stores close.
It is unwise to count ourselves among such selfish ones who ignore present truth as contradicting present truth presented before it was present.
Like most false Christs do you really think that if you can fake sincerity people will believe you? Examine such words of "truth" and you will no doubt discover that the time you have been told is not the actual time. The same time it has been for 140 years: time for God to act and slay those who disagreee with the FDS, whether an individual or a "class". (Though the WT never claimed that.)
I find it astonishing in your question (it may have been a mere objection masquerading as a statement of your selfish desire) that you think an issue of salvation in this time of the end should conform to your narrow minded worldly views of sexuality.
Why would you want only a "straight" ie heterosexual answer? Does not the Bible say that God is not partial, and wants all sorts of men to attain to salvation?
In view of this i am sure this is a mere objection that you dont want to go to bed yet (alone - and not play with yourself) If you are under 18 I see no further point in presenting truth to an unbelieving youngster. Jehovahs Witnesses do not believe in infant baptism.
HB
And WHY exactly do you think having an omelette could justify missing the meeting?
Missing a meeting is its own justification. The omelette is just a bonus.
W
ROFLOL.
