Scientific Method VS ????

by SweetBabyCheezits 3 Replies latest jw friends

  • SweetBabyCheezits
    SweetBabyCheezits

    This was a tangent from another thread in which we were debating faith and science... PSacramento (thx) rightly pointed out that I was digressing so here' s a new thread.

    IMO, it all comes down to (religious) people trying to pin an ABSOLUTE answer on an unexplained event. (ie, the first cause = creation by Judeo-Christian god, holy spirit coming upon someone, or a demon experience...)

    The superstitious and/or religious will quickly attribute the unexplained to a spirit being(s).

    Science will search for the answers but if none bear evidence, the unexplained simply remains unexplained... until a theory passes through the scientific method meat grinder and comes out the other side intact.

    The scientific method is well-established and documented. What consistent method of reasoning and testing is used by the vast majority of the religious community to show how they arrive at their conclusions (doctrine)?

  • leavingwt
    leavingwt

    (1) Pulling it from your a$$

    or

    (2) Making it up as you go

  • Nathan Natas
    Nathan Natas

    3. Imaginative flights of fancy.

    4. Fear of the unknown.

    5. Fear of the unfamiliar.

    6. Reliance on ancient goatherder's tales.

  • SweetBabyCheezits
    SweetBabyCheezits

    hahaha..... you guys are funny.

    I realize the question seems rhetorical since a widely accepted method of finding religious truth would probably result in fewer religions.

    The scientific method and critical thinking are the main reasons I gravitate toward science for truth. Can anyone sell me on a religious methodology? I'll open it up to a proprietary means (since it's understood there's not a standard across the board).

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit