.. http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/01/22/gravastars/index.html
Apparantly, blackholes don't exsist and the scientists who were so convinced that they did exsists are WRONG hehe.
Without quantum mechanics, the early theorists made crucial mistakes in envisioning black holes and their relationship with space and time...For example, light photons would gain an infinite amount of energy when they reach an event horizon, according to classical theorists. But they ignore the gravitational effects of this unthinkable amount of energy.
Maybe the new quantum theories on exploding stars will be 'rpoven' abut then it will be discovered that according to 'rubber duckie theory' quantum theory is bologna and when stars die they become giant floating rubber duckies.
Point being that no matter what you put your faith in, faith is beleif without proof and can and more often than not will be proven wrong. Just like recently scientists were convinced panda bears were a member of the racoon family, and now they decided they are actually bears after all.
I personally do not like quantum theory, it sounds alot like new-age mystisism and not enough like science to me. Effects like Particles affecting each other thru infinite distances with no known means of interaction are not really explainable at the moment, and I don't think Quantum physics adequatley explains such bizzare phenomena.
We still haven't really explained such everday things as gravity and light very well, just their effects. I kinda hope they are wrong about back holes being wrong, because black holes have given us such great films as Disney's 'Black Hole' and 'Event Horizon' not to mention many cool star trek episodes.
-dan