They are obsessed with preventing people from getting it. They are so afraid of fornication that they make so many stupid rules about conducting oneself with the opposite sex, and these extra rules are often impractical to obey.
What they are blind about is that a significant number of people are gay or bisexual. They go to great lengths to make sure everything is same sex, yet that does no good if one or both of the involved parties are gay or bisexual. Notice how often two people of the same sex are paired off--the late Pio-Sneer Assist program, the reading program they started in 1977 (to help illiterate people become witlesses), and often in missionary work. You get two people, same sex, committed to each other, for a prolonged period of time. This also goes on at Beth Hell. Never do they allow opposite sex pairs, because they are afraid of the Big "F".
Now, what happens if one or both of these parties is gay? Suppose you get a person at Beth Hell, that is battling homosexuality and seemingly has won, but is really in a "stalemate" with the condition. He goes to Beth Hell, and his roommate is also a non-practicing homosexual. This situation would be about as likely to result in fornication as putting two straight people of the opposite sex together. Yet, they never do anything to address this issue. Most of their efforts are wasted on "straight" fornication--gay fornication is just as likely these days, and more so if they suppress opposite sex experiences.
Worse by far, is the hypocrisy of many witlesses on this issue. They blab about how wicked it is for 2 consenting adults, either gay or straight, to have sex with each other (unless married). Then, all too many of them will do a hounding call with a child, get alone with this child, molest them sexually, and then threaten with disfellowshipping for "slander" if this child (or children) tells anyone. Two consenting adults having sex--to be prevented at all costs. A hounder manipulating a child into sex and then threatening this child with disfellowshipping--acceptable.
Perhaps if they would loosen up about the opposite sex and accept that a certain percentage of people are gay or bisexual for whatever reason, they would find less of a problem with sex. The religion would be that much less oppressive, and there would be that much fewer of adults channeling their sex drive toward children. And adopting zero tolerance for adults that coerce or manipulate children into sex and then threatening with dire consequences, particularly if the adult is doing it because (s)he gets kicks out of ruining the lives of those children.
