US SUB Does it Again!

by Amazing 7 Replies latest jw friends

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    You know, the truth is stranger than fiction. The US Sub that hit the Japanese fishing-tourist boat, has done it again. Under a new Captain this time, the submarine USS Greenville bashed into a US Naval Vessel, the USS Ogden.

    Yes, the World's Great Super Power, conquorers of Afghanistan, Victors over Terrorism, and Grand PooBah of the Seven Seas, cannot seem to find people who can drive a simple Submarine. No, someone needs to go back to sub-driving school. Or, just take that Sub, consider it a piece of bad luck, and park it somewhere.

    Actually, we hear of this stuff because our media has much more latitude and desire to publish such things. In decades gone by, especially during WWII, things like this were buried as 'Classified' and our military always looked good. But, today, if you accidently blow snot out the wrong orfice, CNN is right there to tell the whole world about it.

  • SYN
    SYN

    "Hey, what's that noise, Captain?"
    "Oh, don't worry, the crew had baked beans for dinner last night, they are all experiencing technical difficulties!"
    "But it was really loud, Captain!"
    "Ag, they'll be OK, they DID eat a lot of beans!"

    "I see no good reasons why the views given in this volume should shock the religious sensibilities of anyone." -- Charles Darwin, The Origin Of Species, 1869.

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    Is your claim then “excessive incidents?” Though no one wants these accidents to happen at all, human error will always be present. I would like to see the “numbers” to formulate a point of reference. How many subs are out at a time? How many trips do these subs make? What is the ratio of accidents to non incidents? Is two collisions a lot compared to the number of missions/trips made in a year or years? How many nautical miles are covered every year? This information would help us to ascertain if we are dealing with incompetence or just human error based on the numbers.

    Also, the US seems to be more open with these reports. To what extent have other nation’s Sub accidents gone unreported?

    “We all fell down from the milky way, hanging around here for the judgement day, heaven only knows who’s in command.”- Jimmy Buffet

  • Amazing
    Amazing

    Hi ThiChi:

    "Is your claim then “excessive incidents?”
    No. I was making a point of humor with the fact that it is the ""same"" Sub involved in the same kind of accident within one year.

    "Though no one wants these accidents to happen at all, human error will always be present."
    True.

    "I would like to see the “numbers” to formulate a point of reference. How many subs are out at a time? How many trips do these subs make? What is the ratio of accidents to non incidents?"
    Contact the US Dept. of the Navy and see if they will release the data you desire. Many things the military does, in all branches, are normally classified.

    "Is two collisions a lot compared to the number of missions/trips made in a year or years? How many nautical miles are covered every year? This information would help us to ascertain if we are dealing with incompetence or just human error based on the numbers."
    True. I am sure the Navy, Air Force, and Army study every accident carefully to make important safety determinations. And, given all the exercises they each perform, I have no doubt that they do well.

    "Also, the US seems to be more open with these reports. To what extent have other nation’s Sub accidents gone unreported?"
    The Russians have recently become more open. Yes, the US is more open, and I wish we would reign in some of the things that get reported. Given that this is now the "Information Age" and people get cynical and suspect wrongdoing at every turn ... openness has become very popular.

    A Parting thought: When I worked in San Francisco, I watched the USS Enterpirse (Nuclear Aircraft Carrier and Flag Ship of the 7th Fleet) from the top flood of our office building as it came into port. Shortly after it passed under the Oakland-Bay Bridge, it made a sharp left turn toward the Alameda Naval Station - and got stuck in the mud.

    The incident was not the Captain's fault, as the Army Corp of Engineers had not dredged the narrow channel as it should have. The ship was doomed to hit a large sand bar. The Captain was forced to resign from the Navy, because in the Navy, everything is the Captain's responsibility. The reason that he got into so much trouble is that the incident was an embarassment to the Navy to have its most premier Flag Ship run into a sand bar. Pride is more important than realities of steering a ship through an undregded channel, or any other problem. If the military could go back to the days of secrecy, then the Captain might still be at the helm of the Enterprise with his stellar career intact.

  • ashitaka
    ashitaka

    I was just on CNN.com and they said that the Greenville scraped the bottom of the ocean floor during the summer-LOL-a cursed sub.

    ashi

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    ""Pride is more important than realities of steering a ship through an undregded channel, or any other problem. If the military could go back to the days of secrecy, then the Captain might still be at the helm of the Enterprise with his stellar career intact.""

    Very true! Point(s) well taken.

    “We all fell down from the milky way, hanging around here for the judgement day, heaven only knows who’s in command.”- Jimmy Buffet

  • ThiChi
    ThiChi

    .......

  • LDH
    LDH

    Perhaps they hired the crew of the Exxon Valdez?!?!

    I'm sure they would've gotten a cut rate on the crew!

    Lisa

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit