I am curious whether most people here believe that they need to memorize Biblical proofs against WTBTS teachings the way they did as a Witness. My concern is that for someone out for decades, I may read the Bible too much. I am drawn to it almost unnaturally as for me it is the best proof the Witnesses lied and willfully misinterpreted. It frees me. I read commentaries, take college and grad courses, study Koine Greek in some never-ending quest for real liberation. Professionally, I could never know the body of knowledge necessary in my mind. All I can know is a way to reference the system so that research yields consistent results. It is a leap of faith. I feel the same way about the Bible. Enough general knowledge is at my disposal to research anything further.
Yet I notice that some people here have ready scriptures to refute a particular notion. Perhaps I don't deliberately memorize to not repeat my life as a Witness. Also, I don't believe the Bible is infallible or even relevant outside our culture. It strikes me that since the Witnesses apparently rely upon the Bible so much, it is the best way to perhaps start asking questions. I'm not describing my quandary very well. Also, since I've been out for decades now, perhaps I don't need the scriptures securely in my mind as I once did.
Another thought is that I place too much emphasis on knowledge of specific facts and not enough on my character. When I read Jesus, the Social Gospel and radical calls to action are definitely present -- alongside other matters. Reading Jesus upsets my complacency. Being educated and prosperous is not what He emphasized. Mastery of knowledge carries so much in society. Of course, Witnesses place no weight in knowledge. The WT and Awake do mention many factoids which impressed me as a child. As soon as I finish my current reading, I am getting Hassan's books and reading them.