'The Good Man Jesus And The Scoundrel Christ' by Philip Pullman

by nicolaou 5 Replies latest social entertainment

  • nicolaou
    nicolaou

    I just finished reading this marvelous book, has anyone else read it? I don't want to give too much away for the sake of anyone who might choose to read it but here's a partial review by the Telegraph (respected UK newspaper);

    ----------------------

    What Pullman has done is to take the Gospel accounts of Jesus and weave them into a story that runs along the lines of the Gospel narratives, but with one radical innovation. (The book is the latest in a series of retellings of myths, published by Canongate.) He splits the character of Jesus of Nazareth into twin brothers, one named Jesus, the other Christ. Jesus is the lusty healthy baby, born at ease with his physical person; Christ is the sickly child whom his mother favours, and it is he who is found lying in the feeding trough by shepherds and then by the astrologers from the East who have come bearing gifts to the promised “Messiah”.

    From here on, the life of Jesus as we have known it is described in prose that skilfully recapitulates the simplicity of the original material, with each twin acting out different parts. Christ, the weaker twin, is the goody-goody who sucks up to his elders by studying holy texts and astounds them with his precocious rabbinical wisdom. Jesus, on the other hand, is the one who learns carpentry from his father and is favoured by the other children. As they reach manhood, their characters polarise: Christ becomes cautious, fanciful and partial to metaphysics, while Jesus is passionate, antinomian and enamoured of the world’s realities.

    As the story further unfolds, we witness Christ playing the traditional parts of, first, Satan in the wilderness, when he urges Jesus to provide miracles to help persuade his followers of the imminence of the coming “Kingdom of God” and, finally, the Judas figure who betrays his brother with a fatal kiss. This last is due to the machinations of the sinister “stranger”, also described as an “angel”, who is inserted into the story as the demonic principle behind the distortion of Jesus’s teachings and the founding of the Christian Church.

    Advance publicity has suggested that this figure represents St Paul, since he is also the inspiration for Christ’s “documentation” of his brother’s doings.

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/books/bookreviews/7544727/The-Good-Man-Jesus-and-the-Scoundrel-Christ-by-Philip-Pullman-review.html

  • nicolaou
    nicolaou

    Really? It's been out a year, I can't believe no one else here has read it . . . .

  • mrsjones5
    mrsjones5

    I've never understood why the Chirstian world was so up in arms about Philip Pullman's Dark Materials books.

  • glenster
    glenster

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Good_Man_Jesus_and_the_Scoundrel_Christ

    According to the article at the next link, the conflict is just a new version
    of the old controversy of Jesus as believed in mainsteam Christianity vs the
    stance that Jesus as Son of God was an idea Paul added years after Jesus'
    mission (the author's stance apart from the novel as well).
    http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/61198,people,news,philip-pullman-gets-hate-mail-from-christians-for-scoundrel-christ

    The mainstream stance is a choice of faith whatever you decide, and the new
    book is given as a novel. But taking the author's stance seriously, there's no
    need to introduce the Son of God idea of Jesus decades after Jesus' mission. I
    recommend "How on Earth did Jesus Become a God? Historical Questions about
    Earliest Devotion to Jesus" by Larry Hurtado of Edinburgh (the same city as
    Rockstar North). The first controversy about Christ involves Jewish monotheism
    only allowing prayer and worship for God resulting in persecution of followers
    of Jesus for praying to him, etc., with Paul joing the followers in prayer
    (and running into some persecution) later, not introducing the idea.
    http://books.google.com/ebooks?id=Xi5xIxgnNgcC
    http://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Earth-Did-Jesus-Become/dp/0802828612

    Regarding the powerful church point: Jesus can have been a good man of faith
    and wanted a church without wanting the religion as law of the land, etc. In-
    dicating he wanted that is ironic. The culture he came from had that, then
    wanted that, but the early Christians changed that to going among Jews and
    Gentiles without giving offense, sacrificing of themselves to gain others to
    God. The harm has come in making the belief or non-belief stance the law of the
    land, especially as handled by certain leaders. In the case of Christianity, it
    was several centuries after the NT.

  • Mad Sweeney
    Mad Sweeney

    Philip Pullman needs to tell the world what happens next in the life of Lyra Silvertongue Belacqua. I can figure out Jesus on my own, thanks.

    (I hate when an author makes you fall in love with his characters and then just stops and leaves them in limbo. It is so frustrating.)

  • Chariklo
    Chariklo
    Philip Pullman needs to tell the world what happens next in the life of Lyra Silvertongue Belacqua. I can figure out Jesus on my own, thanks.
    (I hate when an author makes you fall in love with his characters and then just stops and leaves them in limbo. It is so frustrating.)

    I totally agree. Anyone else keen on the John Twelve Hawks books? I've only read The Traveller and The Dark River so far.

Share this

Google+
Pinterest
Reddit