OMG Just watching JFK 3 shots that changed America. AM I the only one to see this??

by hamsterbait 5 Replies latest jw friends

• 

  hamsterbait

  I have now watched the footage of Lee H. Oswald being shot Over and over all evening.

  I have watched it backwards a frame at a time and forwards a frame at a time and slomo.

  How many men are standing left of picture as LHO and escorts enter right of picture?

  How many at end of tussle?

  They come out of the door with LHO. The assassin is already visible, in a GREY hat and black jacket.

  The shot changes to newsreel footage. The assassin comes forward - we see his Grey hat, a curiously black and crooked hairline at the back of his neck, and in slomo note the SHAPE of his ear. It is small, angular with the earhole well to the rear of the pinna. Have you ever seen an ear that shape or size? (More on that later)

  Assassin shoots LHO, the escort on LHO's right (left to us) in light coat appears to grab the Assassin. Watch carefully a few frames later as the assassins head comes up at the centre - he has NO HAT ON. A bare headed man then presses a hat onto his head.

  The Assasin is rushed across to the right of screen. Look at his hat now. it is BLACK. You see the gun in his hand. Iwatched this over and over. Please tell me that I am not imagining - the man emerging gun in hand, after a broad jacketed back blocks our view, please tell me he does not have bigger ears than the assassin showed just before opening fire. They are not even the same shape!! The earhole is not so far back.

  I hate conspiracy theories but this looked like choreography to me. Do you think the key is in the melee of feet and bottoms?

  At one point LHO 's head on the ground is clearly seen between the feet of his escort in light coat, who stood to his right as they entered. Who is the escort in light coat pushing across to his own left and rear?

  Something is not quite right here. Why go to all this trouble. Watch the footage as I just did and tell me the man emerging AFTER the shooting and brawl has the same hair ears and hat as the one who came up and shot LHO point blank.

  Why did the Police Chief say the FBI had interrogated LHO a fortnight before, then later said this was a misunderstanding, and he knew nothing of this?

  Even the interference by mixing horizontal and vertical hold doesnt look convincing. interference back then produced snow. That interference is produced on controls.... You saw it often enough on the Twighlight Zone and Time Tunnel (I am losing it aint I?)

  I am not an expert on this AT ALL. I just bought a history DVD and am now smelling rats as malodorous as in Witchtower Lala Land.

  HB
• 

  SixofNine

  jesus christ
• 

  hamsterbait

  Have now done some googling - The pictures of Jack Ruby who shot LHO are not the same size or shape as those of the assassin in the footage.

  later interviews of eyewitnesses said it was a "man in a BLACK hat that shot LHO. Look at the footage!!!

  The hat is definately Not black..... Tell a lie often enough.....

  I think I shall go back to the meetings. This Wicked System of Things sucks, MEGA.

  HB
• 

  strymeckirules

  all the footage was staged, hollywood style.

  they were creating the event for you.

  they have the power to write history to their likeing.

  welcome to enlightenment.
• 

  hamsterbait

  Conversation:

  Lyndon B. Johnson with J. Edgar Hoover, 29th November 1963:

  HOOVER: I've seen the reports on the Senate investigating committee they've been talking about.

  JOHNSON: Well.. we think if we don't have... I want to get by just with your file and your report.

  HOOVER: I think it would be very very bad to have a rash of investigations on this thing.

  JOHNSON: Well the only way we can stop them is probably to appoint a high level one to evaluate your report.... And put somebody that's pretty good on it from, that I can select out of the government and tell the House and Senate not to go ahead with an investigation.

  HMMM

  HB
• 

  Band on the Run

  Earl Warren later had heated words with LBJ. He was yanked into serving by LBJ. Warren felt all his public service was minimized by the report.

  I saw the assassination of Oswald live as a kid. It seemed beyond belief. Without referencing nutty conspiracy theories, I thought at the time and still think every time I see the footage that something is very wrong with the event. Can't put it into words. I don't feel the same way about JFK's death. Of course, the circumstances and camera angles were so different.

  I never understood why Ruby was so personally invested. If Oswald had lived, a trial might have brought a host of secret Kennedy foreign dealings to light. Also, assuming the stereotypes about Texans, why were the police the keystone cops? Why wasn't the FBI or Secret Service present in a consultative manner. You would not need special jurisdiction. The FBI was all over NYC on 9.11 and after. What happened to the dummy police commissioner? The Dallas cops should have assigned special cops to use their bodies as shields if anyone interfered.

  I've read many times that RFK had no faith in the commission. Hoover would authorize only the version that made the FBI look saintly. Correction, that made Hoover saintly.

  Generations of Americans are convinced that some monkey business was afoot. The mere belief that government did not behave well has weakend law enforcement. Hey, when 9.11 happened, hardly anyone believed the EPA air quality tests or that everything was made public. I do recall reading about John Wilkes Booth trial and that of the other conspirators. There were questions raised in that case but nothing like with JFK.

  I've read both the New York Times and watched Frontline on PBS about the anthrax attacks. Determining who was responsible was so important. No one close to the investigation has any idea as to whether the two men accused of being the attacker by the FBI had any involvement. It makes one wonder.