Could this be another slant on the video presented ?
As reported in the Herald Sun mon.April 30 2012 by journalist Andrew Bolt
and I quote : Whether he meant it or not,Shortens message was clear,he wasn`t saying he agreed with Gillard on Slipper,but the opposite.And he wanted us to know it,because Gillards catostrophic judgement is not just destroying her own reputation but staining his own--and that of every minister forced to defend her incompetence. By supporting Slipper as speaker since the latest allegationsagainst him broke a week ago Gillard has made herself seem an unprincipled schemer.
Not once in any press conference last week did she specifically condemn sexual harassment.She stressed only Slippers claim of innocence,which allowed opposition leader Tony Abbot to claim" she just doesn`t get it" Shorten on thursday was very keen to show he, at at least, did get it.and said at least half a dozen times that sexual harassment was" completely unacceptable"
He hinted that Slipper would be" considering his position"and journalists reporting his remarks concluded he wanted Slipper to stand aside until the case against him was settled.
Gillard did not---but this weekend must have realised splitting with Shorten over Slipper was a fight that would kill her.And so she got Slipper to postpone his return and Thompson to sit apart from labor in parliment. unquote.
just saying
smiddy