This has been irking me for a bit. Many of us on here acknowledge the Society's subtle demand to be worshipped like God.
They are God's mouthpiece, yet they make the claim "question the Organization is like questioning Jehovah." "Accept what we say because Jehovah is saying it."
When you call out the typical Witness on worshipping the WTS, they argue adamantly that they don't worship the Society. Only Jehovah.
But when you tell a Witness to their face that the Society has done awful things, like "joined the Beast," created a Governing Body with no Scriptural support, Malawi v Mexico, made false predictions, flip flopped doctrine, what is the common accusation?
You're an Apostate. Many of the bolder Witnesses on the Net will call you it. It's a little more difficult to get one to immediately say it to your face, but it happens.
But on what grounds do they accuse you of Apostacy? An apostate is someone who goes against God, no?
If you are/were a Witness, does this line sound familiar?
"You're spreading lies about God."
How does saying the Organization protects pedophiles amount to lying about God? You know, I think they'd be more tolerable if they just admitted they worship a group of men in New York. It's frustrating to argue with somebody who has no evidence to support their claim when you have mountains of evidence to support your claim, and they still feel like they're right.
The Branch Davidians weren't this looney.